Comparison of therapy-related and de novo core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: A bone marrow pathology group study
- PMID: 32249963
- DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25814
Comparison of therapy-related and de novo core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: A bone marrow pathology group study
Abstract
This multi-institutional study retrospectively evaluated clinicopathologic and genetic characteristics in 351 patients with core-binding-factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML), comprising 69 therapy-related (t-CBF-AML) and 282 de novo cases. The T-CBF-AML patients were older, had lower WBC counts, and slightly higher hemoglobin than patients with de novo disease. Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities were more frequent in patients with de novo disease than t-CBF-AML (57.1% vs 41.1%, P = .026). Patients with secondary cytogenetic abnormalities had longer overall survival (OS) than those without abnormalities (median 190 vs 87 months, P = .021); trisomy 8, trisomy 22, and loss of the X or Y chromosome were associated with longer OS. In the 165 cases performed of targeted gene sequencing, pathogenic mutations were detected in 75.7% of cases, and were more frequent in de novo than in therapy-related disease (P = .013). Mutations were found in N/KRAS (37.0%), FLT3 (27.8%), KIT (17.2%), TET2 (4.9%), and ASXL1 (3.9%). The TET2 mutations were associated with shorter OS (P = .012) while N/KRAS mutation was associated with longer OS in t(8;21) AML patients (P = .001). The KIT mutation did not show prognostic significance in this cohort. Although they received similar therapy, t-CBF-AML patients had shorter OS than de novo patients (median 69 vs 190 months, P = .038). In multivariate analysis of all patients, older age and absence of any secondary cytogenetic abnormalities were significant predictors of shorter OS. Among the t-CBF-AML subset, age and hemoglobin were significant on multivariate analysis. This study demonstrated that although de novo and t-CBF-AML patients share many features, t-CBF-AML patients have worse clinical outcome than de novo patients.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Core binding factor acute myeloid leukaemia and c-KIT mutations.Oncol Rep. 2013 May;29(5):1867-72. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2328. Epub 2013 Mar 5. Oncol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23467883
-
Survival is poorer in patients with secondary core-binding factor acute myelogenous leukemia compared with de novo core-binding factor leukemia.Cancer. 2009 Jul 15;115(14):3217-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24367. Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19441109 Free PMC article.
-
KIT D816 mutated/CBF-negative acute myeloid leukemia: a poor-risk subtype associated with systemic mastocytosis.Leukemia. 2019 May;33(5):1124-1134. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0346-z. Epub 2019 Jan 11. Leukemia. 2019. PMID: 30635631 Free PMC article.
-
[Molecular pathogenesis and treatment of core binding factor-acute myeloid leukemia].Rinsho Ketsueki. 2018;59(10):1997-2006. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.59.1997. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2018. PMID: 30305502 Review. Japanese.
-
Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.Semin Oncol. 2008 Aug;35(4):410-7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2008.04.011. Semin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18692691 Review.
Cited by
-
CPX-351 and allogeneic stem cell transplant for a therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia that developed after treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a case report and review of the literature.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 25;13:1291457. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1291457. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38333543 Free PMC article.
-
Secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in core-binding factor AML harboring inv(16) vs t(8;21).Blood Adv. 2021 May 25;5(10):2481-2489. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003605. Blood Adv. 2021. PMID: 34003250 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular genetics profiling of core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in pediatrics.Ther Adv Hematol. 2025 Apr 16;16:20406207251330064. doi: 10.1177/20406207251330064. eCollection 2025. Ther Adv Hematol. 2025. PMID: 40290757 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How I treat secondary acute myeloid leukemia.Blood. 2025 Mar 20;145(12):1260-1272. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024011. Blood. 2025. PMID: 39356870 Review.
-
Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: long-term outcome of 70 patients uniformly treated with "7+3".Blood Cancer J. 2022 Apr 7;12(4):55. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00654-0. Blood Cancer J. 2022. PMID: 35393398 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Solh M, Yohe S, Weisdorf D, Ustun C. Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: heterogeneity, monitoring, and therapy. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(12):1121-1131.
-
- Duployez N, Marceau-Renaut A, Boissel N, et al. Comprehensive mutational profiling of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2451-2459.
-
- Appelbaum FR, Kopecky KJ, Tallman MS, et al. The clinical spectrum of adult acute myeloid leukaemia associated with core binding factor translocations. Br J Haematol. 2006;135(2):165-173.
-
- Gustafson SA, Lin P, Chen SS, et al. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21) (q22;q22) shares many features with de novo acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22) but does not have a favorable outcome. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(5):647-655.
-
- Marcucci G, Mrózek K, Ruppert AS, et al. Prognostic factors and outcome of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia patients with t(8;21) differ from those of patients with inv(16): a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5705-5717.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous