Gepants, calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists: what could be their role in migraine treatment?
- PMID: 32251023
- DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000806
Gepants, calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists: what could be their role in migraine treatment?
Abstract
Purpose of review: Migraine is the second leading cause of years lived with disability after back pain. Poor tolerability, contraindications, drug-drug interactions and efficacy limited to a subpopulation make new approaches necessary for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. The study of the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway over the last decades is a good example of translational medicine leading to directed therapies for patients.
Recent findings: After some of the first-generation CGRP receptor antagonists, gepants, were not fully developed because of hepatotoxicity, the second generation of gepants have shown efficacy, safety and tolerability in recent clinical trials.
Summary: Both rimegepant and ubrogepant have published positive randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials data. Vazegepant is the first intranasal gepant for the acute treatment of migraine and has announced a positive phase II/III study. Daily rimegepant use has preliminary data to suggest efficacy. Atogepant has shown efficacy in migraine prevention in a phase II/III study. Most importantly, hepatotoxicity has not been reported in specifically designed phase I studies or long-term extension studies, with rimegepant or ubrogepant, or in a preventive study with atogepant. Given the preventive effect, it seems likely that gepants will not lead to medication overuse headache. They will likely have no cardiovascular warnings. Because of the particular benefit gepants may represent for these groups of patients, specific studies in patients with medication overuse headache, as well as those with comorbid cardiovascular diseases, would be of considerable interest.
References
- 
    - Collaborators GBDH. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:954–976.
 
- 
    - Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Katsarava Z, et al. The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 2014; 15:31.
 
- 
    - Vo P, Fang J, Bilitou A, et al. Patients’ perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Headache Pain 2018; 19:82.
 
- 
    - Leonardi M, Raggi A, Bussone G, D’Amico D. Health-related quality of life, disability and severity of disease in patients with migraine attending to a specialty headache center. Headache 2010; 50:1576–1586.
 
- 
    - Bloudek LM, Stokes M, Buse DC, et al. Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). J Headache Pain 2012; 13:361–378.
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
- Research Materials
 
        