Discussion of "Assessing the goodness-of-fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test," by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow
- PMID: 32251523
- DOI: 10.1111/biom.13255
Discussion of "Assessing the goodness-of-fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test," by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow
Comment in
-
Rejoinder to "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test".Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):575-577. doi: 10.1111/biom.13250. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Biometrics. 2020. PMID: 32251533 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):549-560. doi: 10.1111/biom.13249. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Biometrics. 2020. PMID: 32134502
Similar articles
-
Discussion on "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test" by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow.Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):564-568. doi: 10.1111/biom.13251. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Biometrics. 2020. PMID: 32251538 No abstract available.
-
Discussion on "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test" by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow.Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):561-563. doi: 10.1111/biom.13257. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Biometrics. 2020. PMID: 32251532 No abstract available.
-
Discussion on "Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test" by Giovanni Nattino, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow.Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):572-574. doi: 10.1111/biom.13248. Epub 2020 Apr 6. Biometrics. 2020. PMID: 32251529 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):965-80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<965::aid-sim509>3.0.co;2-o. Stat Med. 1997. PMID: 9160492 Review.
-
A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.Prev Vet Med. 2018 Jan 1;149:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Prev Vet Med. 2018. PMID: 29290291 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in adult psychiatric outpatients in Qatar using two risk assessment tools.Qatar Med J. 2021 Sep 27;2021(2):27. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2021.27. eCollection 2021. Qatar Med J. 2021. PMID: 34604012 Free PMC article.
-
Using easy-to-collect indices to develop and validate models for identifying metabolic syndrome and pre-metabolic syndrome.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 11;16:1587354. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1587354. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40568563 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Chen, L.C. and Wang, J.Y. (2013). Testing the fit of the logistic model for matched case-control studies. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 57, 309-319.
-
- Cheng, K.F. and Chen, L.C. (2004). Testing goodness-of-fit of a logistic regression model with case-control data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 124, 409-422.
-
- Wellek, S. (2010). Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority, 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
-
- Yuan, K.H., Chan, W., Marcoulides, G.A. and Bentler, P.M. (2016). Assessing structural equation models by equivalence testing with adjusted fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(3), 319-330.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources