Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm
- PMID: 32251926
- PMCID: PMC7272286
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102019
Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm
Abstract
In recent years, biotechnological breakthroughs have led to identification of complex and unique biologic features associated with carcinogenesis. Tumor and cell-free DNA profiling, immune markers, and proteomic and RNA analyses are used to identify these characteristics for optimization of anticancer therapy in individual patients. Consequently, clinical trials have evolved, shifting from tumor type-centered to gene-directed, histology-agnostic, with innovative adaptive design tailored to biomarker profiling with the goal to improve treatment outcomes. A plethora of precision medicine trials have been conducted. The majority of these trials demonstrated that matched therapy is associated with superior outcomes compared to non-matched therapy across tumor types and in specific cancers. To improve the implementation of precision medicine, this approach should be used early in the course of the disease, and patients should have complete tumor profiling and access to effective matched therapy. To overcome the complexity of tumor biology, clinical trials with combinations of gene-targeted therapy with immune-targeted approaches (e.g., checkpoint blockade, personalized vaccines and/or chimeric antigen receptor T-cells), hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and/or novel agents should be considered. These studies should target dynamic changes in tumor biologic abnormalities, eliminating minimal residual disease, and eradicating significant subclones that confer resistance to treatment. Mining and expansion of real-world data, facilitated by the use of advanced computer data processing capabilities, may contribute to validation of information to predict new applications for medicines. In this review, we summarize the clinical trials and discuss challenges and opportunities to accelerate the implementation of precision oncology.
Keywords: Genomic landscape; Matched therapy; Molecular profile; Personalized; Precision; ctDNA.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou has the following financial relationships to disclose: Research Funding (Institution): Immatics, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Tempus, OBI Pharma, EMD Serono, Baxalta, ONYX, Bayer, Boston Biomedical, Placon Therapeutics, Karus Therapeutics, and Tvardi Therapeutics. Consulting or Advisory Role: Covance, Genentech, and Tempus. Dr. Elena Fountzilas has the following financial relationships to disclose: Travel grant from Merck and K.A.M Oncology/Hematology; stock ownership Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Mina Nikanjam has the following financial relationships to disclose: Research Funding (Institution): Regeneron, Bristol Myers Squib, Immunocore, Idera, and Merck. Dr. Razelle Kurzrock has the following financial relationships to disclose: Research Funding (Institution): Incyte, Genentech, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sequenom, Foundation Medicine, Konica Minolta, Grifols, Biologic Dynamics, and Guardant. Consulting role: X-Biotech, Loxo, and Actuate Therapeutics. Speaker fees: Roche. Ownership interest: IDbyDNA and Curematch, Inc.
References
-
- Von Hoff DD, Stephenson JJ Jr., Rosen P, et al. Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients’ tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4877–83. - PubMed
-
- Le Tourneau C, Delord JP, Goncalves A, et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1324–34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical