Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 2;8(4):507.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040507.

Microbial Resources as a Tool for Enhancing Sustainability in Winemaking

Affiliations
Review

Microbial Resources as a Tool for Enhancing Sustainability in Winemaking

Tiziana Nardi. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

In agriculture, the wine sector is one of the industries most affected by the sustainability issue. It is responsible for about 0.3% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions from anthropogenic activities. Sustainability in vitiviniculture was firstly linked to vineyard management, where the use of fertilizers, pesticides and heavy metals is a major concern. More recently, the contribution of winemaking, from grape harvest to bottling, has also been considered. Several cellar processes could be improved for reducing the environmental impact of the whole chain, including microbe-driven transformations. This paper reviews the potential of microorganisms and interactions thereof as a natural, environmentally friendly tool to improve the sustainability aspects of winemaking, all along the production chain. The main phases identified as potentially interesting for exploiting microbial activities to lower inputs are: (i) pre-fermentative stages, (ii) alcoholic fermentation, (iii) stage between alcoholic and malolactic fermentation, (iv) malolactic fermentation, (v) stabilization and spoilage risk management, and (vi) by-products and wastewater treatment. The presence of proper yeast or bacterial strains, the management and timing of inoculation of starter cultures, and some appropriate technological modifications that favor selected microbial activities can lead to several positive effects, including (among other) energy savings, reduction of chemical additives such as sulfites, and reuse of certain residues.

Keywords: Saccharomyces cerevisiae; bioprotection; enology; fermentation; lactic acid bacteria; non-Saccharomyces yeasts; wine by-products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme showing the different winemaking phases and displaying the critical points considered in the paper for enhancing sustainability. Symbols legend: (1) Sulfite reduction, (2) biodiversity improvement, (3) energy savings, (4) reuse and valorization of by-products.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trioli G., Sacchi A., Corbo C., Trevisan M. Environmental impact of vinegrowing and winemaking inputs: An european survey. Internet J. Viticult. Enol. 2015;7:2.
    1. De Matos C.T., Garcia J.C., Aurambout J.-P., Manfredi S. Environmental sustainability assessment of bioeconomy products and processes—Progress report 1. Eur. Comm. Rep. EUR 27356 EN. 2015 doi: 10.2791/252460. - DOI
    1. Pomarici E., Vecchio R. Will sustainability shape the future wine market? Wine Econ. Policy. 2019;8:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2019.05.001. - DOI
    1. Santini C., Cavicchi A., Casini L. Sustainability in the wine industry: Key questions and research trends a. Agric. Food Econ. 2013;1:9. doi: 10.1186/2193-7532-1-9. - DOI
    1. Bonamente E., Scrucca F., Rinaldi S., Merico M.C., Asdrubali F., Lamastra L. Environmental impact of an Italian wine bottle: Carbon and water footprint assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;560–561:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.026. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources