Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):108.
doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02903-w.

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe

Erlend L Fjær  1 , Erling R Landet  1 , Courtney L McNamara  1 , Terje A Eikemo  2
Affiliations

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Europe

Erlend L Fjær et al. BMC Complement Med Ther. .

Abstract

Background: While the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has become increasingly popular in western societies, we do not understand why CAM use is more frequent in some countries than in others. The aim of this article is to examine the determinants of CAM use at the individual and country-level.

Methods: Logistic multilevel regressions were applied analyzing data from 33,371 respondents in 21 European countries (including Israel) from the seventh round of the European Social Survey. We examined CAM in terms of overall use and also dichotomized treatments into physical and consumable subgroups.

Results: At the individual level, we found CAM use to be associated with a range of socioeconomic, demographic and health indicators. At the country level, we found that countries' health expenditures were positively related to the prevalence of overall and physical CAM treatments.

Conclusions: A common predictor for CAM use, both at the individual (in terms of education and financial strain) and country-level (in terms of health expenditures per capita), is greater resources.

Keywords: CAM use; Europe; Socio-economic position; health care systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venn diagram of the three categories of CAM
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baer HA. The New Blackwell Companion to Medical Sociology. 2010. Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Processes of Legitimation, Professionalization, and Cooption; pp. 373–390.
    1. Briggs JP. Complementary, alternative and integrative health practices. In: Kasper D, Fauci A, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 19. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2015.
    1. Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Mullner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. Ochsner J. 2012;12(1):45–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(10):924–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02945.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiles J, Rosenberg MW. ‘Gentle caring experience’. Seeking alternative health care in Canada. Health Place. 2001;7(3):209–224. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00011-9. - DOI - PubMed