Prospective evaluation of a urinary biomarker panel to detect and predict recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
- PMID: 32253580
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03188-x
Prospective evaluation of a urinary biomarker panel to detect and predict recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a feasibility phase study of a panel of putative protein biomarkers and determine whether it can identify and predict tumor recurrence in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) on follow-up.
Methods: We prospectively analyzed the urine of 152 patients previously treated for NMIBC. Quantitative expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), DJ-1, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-1), matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared amongst patients with and without bladder cancer recurrence at urine collection and during 3 years of follow-up. Tumor recurrence was confirmed by pathologic analysis. We performed a prediction analysis, excluding patients with recurrence at the start of the study, and assessed the influence of previous use of intravesical BCG on the level of biomarkers.
Results: Median follow-up time was 47 months (interquartile range 39-50 months). Sixteen patients (10.5%) were diagnosed with recurrence at the start of the study, and 21 (15.4%) were diagnosed during the study. Three biomarker proteins (apoA-1, MMP-9, and IL-8) appear to hold diagnostic potential [odds ratio (OR) = 12.9; 95% CI 3.5-47.4]; while, PAI-1 and IL-8 predict recurrence (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.4-11.4). Previous use of intravesical BCG did not affect biomarker levels.
Conclusion: In the feasibility phase, the panel of urine biomarkers analyzed detected and predicted recurrence of NMIBC and provided reliable results in patients who had previously used intravesical BCG. Validation studies are required to confirm the panel clinical utility.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Bladder cancer; Diagnosis; Recurrence; Urothelial carcinoma.
References
-
- van Rhijn BW, Burger M, Lotan Y, Solsona E, Stief CG, Sylvester RJ, Witjes JA, Zlotta AR (2009) Recurrence and progression of disease in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: from epidemiology to treatment strategy. Eur Urol 56:430–442 - DOI
-
- Avritscher EBC, Cooksley CD, Grossman HB, Sabichi AL, Hamblin L, Dinney CP, Elting LS (2006) Clinical model of lifetime cost of treating bladder cancer and associated complications. Urology 68:549–553 - DOI
-
- van der Aa MN, Steyerberg EW, Sen EF, Zwarthoff EC, Kirkels WJ, van der Kwast TH, Essink-Bot ML (2008) Patients’ perceived burden of cystoscopic and urinary surveillance of bladder cancer: a randomized comparison. BJU Int 101:1106–1110 - DOI
-
- Soria F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, Gontero P, D’Andrea D, Gust KM, Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Palou J, Shariat SF (2018) An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 36:1981–1995 - DOI
-
- Sayyid RK, Sayyid AK, Klaassen Z et al (2018) Replacing surveillance cystoscopy with urinary biomarkers in followup of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: patients and urologic oncologists’ perspectives. Can Urol Assoc J 12:E210–E218 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous