Performance of elite maize genotypes under selected sustainable intensification options in Kenya
- PMID: 32255897
- PMCID: PMC7079296
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107738
Performance of elite maize genotypes under selected sustainable intensification options in Kenya
Abstract
Combining different cropping and tillage systems with different genotypes across several cropping seasons can reveal opportunities for sustainable intensification (SI). The objective of this study was to assess the performance of six maize genotypes under intercropping with conservation tillage (no-till) - two promising options for SI. The experiment was carried out over three years (or six cropping seasons) at Kiboko Research Station, Kenya with sole cropping and mouldboard ploughing as baseline production systems. Results showed that maize genotypes and cropping systems had a significant effect on yield, but the effect of tillage was not significant. Moreover, there was no significant interactive effects of the tested factors on maize yield. The maize genotype CKH10085 had the highest yield of 7.7 t ha-1 under sole cropping yet it also recorded the largest yield penalty due to intercropping of 1.1 t ha-1. On the other hand, genotype CKH10717 maintained the same average yield of 7.1 t ha-1 in both conventional and conservation tillage systems. The commercial genotype genotype CKH10080 and CKH08051 were more stable than the other experimental genotypes under the variable growing and management conditions. These two genotypes are of intermediate maturity and drought tolerance, two critical attributes to improved maize production. Intercropping reduced maize yields due to increased competition, for example the overall yield of sole cropping was 7.1 t ha-1 compared with 6.4 t ha-1 under intercropping; representing an overall yield penalty of 0.7 t ha-1. The differences in performance of maize genotypes revealed opportunities to deploy genotypes to reduce risk or maximize yield, depending on the biophysical circumstances and the production objective of the farmer.
Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Conventional tillage; Crop competition; Long-Term experiment; Maize-Cowpea intercropping; Sustainability, genotype stability.
© 2020 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures





References
-
- Adhikari U., Nejadhashemi A.P., Woznicki S.A. Climate change and eastern Africa: a review of impact on major crops. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4:110–132.
-
- Araya A., Stroosnijder L. Effects of tied ridges and mulch on barley (Hordeum vulgare) rainwater use efficiency and production in Northern Ethiopia. Agric. Water Manag. 2010;97:841–847.
-
- Baudron F., Tittonell P., Corbeels M., Letourmy P., Giller K.E. Comparative performance of conservation agriculture and current smallholder farming practices in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Field Crops Res. 2012;132:117–128.
-
- Bk S.B., Shrestha J. Effect of conservation agriculture on growth and productivity of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) in Terai Region of Nepal. World J. Agric. Res. 2014;2:168–175.
-
- Bommarco R., Kleijn D., Potts S.G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013;28:230–238. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials