Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1:249:107738.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107738.

Performance of elite maize genotypes under selected sustainable intensification options in Kenya

Affiliations

Performance of elite maize genotypes under selected sustainable intensification options in Kenya

Leonard Rusinamhodzi et al. Field Crops Res. .

Abstract

Combining different cropping and tillage systems with different genotypes across several cropping seasons can reveal opportunities for sustainable intensification (SI). The objective of this study was to assess the performance of six maize genotypes under intercropping with conservation tillage (no-till) - two promising options for SI. The experiment was carried out over three years (or six cropping seasons) at Kiboko Research Station, Kenya with sole cropping and mouldboard ploughing as baseline production systems. Results showed that maize genotypes and cropping systems had a significant effect on yield, but the effect of tillage was not significant. Moreover, there was no significant interactive effects of the tested factors on maize yield. The maize genotype CKH10085 had the highest yield of 7.7 t ha-1 under sole cropping yet it also recorded the largest yield penalty due to intercropping of 1.1 t ha-1. On the other hand, genotype CKH10717 maintained the same average yield of 7.1 t ha-1 in both conventional and conservation tillage systems. The commercial genotype genotype CKH10080 and CKH08051 were more stable than the other experimental genotypes under the variable growing and management conditions. These two genotypes are of intermediate maturity and drought tolerance, two critical attributes to improved maize production. Intercropping reduced maize yields due to increased competition, for example the overall yield of sole cropping was 7.1 t ha-1 compared with 6.4 t ha-1 under intercropping; representing an overall yield penalty of 0.7 t ha-1. The differences in performance of maize genotypes revealed opportunities to deploy genotypes to reduce risk or maximize yield, depending on the biophysical circumstances and the production objective of the farmer.

Keywords: Conservation agriculture; Conventional tillage; Crop competition; Long-Term experiment; Maize-Cowpea intercropping; Sustainability, genotype stability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Productivity of six genotypes in sole and intercropping with cowpea and under conventional (CT) and conservation tillage (CON_T) practices for six cropping seasons (2013–2016) in on-station trials at Kiboko, Kenya.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Combined violin and boxplot to show the overall distribution of maize grain yield in (a) two cropping systems, and (b) two tillage systems over six seasons at Kiboko, Kenya.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relative comparison of maize grain yield in tillage and cropping systems treatments for the six genotypes tested over six seasons at Kiboko, Kenya.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diverging bar chart to show the variance of varietal yield above and below an average yield based on performance of the six genotypes tested over six seasons at Kiboko, Kenya.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Variability of rainfall around the mean for the six cropping seasons at Kiboko Research Station, Kenya.

References

    1. Adhikari U., Nejadhashemi A.P., Woznicki S.A. Climate change and eastern Africa: a review of impact on major crops. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4:110–132.
    1. Araya A., Stroosnijder L. Effects of tied ridges and mulch on barley (Hordeum vulgare) rainwater use efficiency and production in Northern Ethiopia. Agric. Water Manag. 2010;97:841–847.
    1. Baudron F., Tittonell P., Corbeels M., Letourmy P., Giller K.E. Comparative performance of conservation agriculture and current smallholder farming practices in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Field Crops Res. 2012;132:117–128.
    1. Bk S.B., Shrestha J. Effect of conservation agriculture on growth and productivity of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) in Terai Region of Nepal. World J. Agric. Res. 2014;2:168–175.
    1. Bommarco R., Kleijn D., Potts S.G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013;28:230–238. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources