The results of a stepwise implementation of a fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement patients
- PMID: 32255989
- PMCID: PMC7114635
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.004
The results of a stepwise implementation of a fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement patients
Abstract
Background: Several reports have shown that enhanced recovery or fast-track (FT) regime introduction in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) results in significant reduction in length of stay (LOS) with no associated increase of complications or readmission rate. Despite that, FT programs for arthroplasty have has not been uniformly recognized or accepted by many orthopaedic surgeons and there is still no consensus on the best implementation process. The aim of this study was to report the results of a stepwise implementation of a FT regime in TKR and THR patients in a general orthopaedic department.
Material and methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data (from 2014 to 2017) concerning all consecutive unselected patients who underwent TKR or THR on Monday morning. At stage 1 the rehabilitation and physiotherapy component was changed, at stage 2 and 3 a patient's blood management program and a pain management program were prospectively recorded (i.e. respectively Patients' demographics, ASA classification, Charlson index, LOS, blood loss, transfusion rate, complications and 30 - day readmissions).
Results: Four hundred and thirty four patients underwent either TKR (n: 302) or THR (n:132) and were included in this study. A gradual reduction of mean LOS was found in THR patients from 5.7 days to 3.0 days and in TKR patients from 5.6 days to 3.4 days. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in complications or regarding the 30-day readmission rate at the different stages of implementation of the different FT components (i.e. at the final stage 96.7% of THR and 86.7% of TKR patients were discharged to home by the fourth post-operative day).
Conclusion: The stepwise implementation of a FT program in an unelected population of THR and TKR patients was effective and safe, reducing the post-surgical recovery time and patients' LOS with no major complications and no increase of 30-day re-admissions.
Keywords: Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-track; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
No increase in readmissions or adverse events after implementation of fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement at 8 Swedish hospitals: An observational before-and-after study of 14,148 total joint replacements 2011-2015.Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):522-527. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1492507. Epub 2018 Jul 9. Acta Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29985681 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in hip and knee replacement surgery: description of a multidisciplinary program to improve management of the patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00603-4. Epub 2019 May 3. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020. PMID: 31054080
-
Postoperative Morbidity and Discharge Destinations After Fast-Track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 85 Years.Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1807-15. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001190. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 27195631
-
Consent process for elective total hip and knee arthroplasty.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Dec;19(3):274-8. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900302. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011. PMID: 22184153 Review.
-
Factors associated with hospital stay length, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31208932 Review.
Cited by
-
Study on the effect factors of discharge readiness of total hip arthroplasty patients.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 23;11:1405375. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1405375. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39247633 Free PMC article.
-
Are patients ready for discharge from the hospital after fast-track total knee arthroplasty?-A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0303935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303935. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38809900 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced Recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA): A Contemporary Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Usage of Key Elements.Orthop Surg. 2023 May;15(5):1228-1240. doi: 10.1111/os.13710. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36971112 Free PMC article.
-
Stepping toward outpatient total hip arthroplasty with a rapid discharge protocol.J Orthop. 2021 Oct 2;27:153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.09.012. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 34650323 Free PMC article.
-
Standards of perioperative management in total knee and hip arthroplasty procedures. A survey-based study. Part I: Preoperative management.Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023;55(4):262-271. doi: 10.5114/ait.2023.132832. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2023. PMID: 38084570 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F., Dardennes C., Reginster J.Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 2004;86-a(5):963–974. - PubMed
-
- Kehlet H., Mythen M. Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk? Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(3):289–291. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 2007;89(4):780–785. - PubMed
-
- Husted H., Jensen C.M., Solgaard S., Kehlet H. Reduced length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty in Denmark 2000-2009: from research to implementation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(1):101–104. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources