Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 25:21:100-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.004. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.

The results of a stepwise implementation of a fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement patients

Georgios I Drosos  1 , Ioannis E Kougioumtzis  2 , Stylianos Tottas  2 , Athanasios Ververidis  3 , Christos Chatzipapas  4 , Grigorios Tripsianis  5 , Konstantinos Tilkeridis  3
Affiliations

The results of a stepwise implementation of a fast-track program in total hip and knee replacement patients

Georgios I Drosos et al. J Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Several reports have shown that enhanced recovery or fast-track (FT) regime introduction in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) results in significant reduction in length of stay (LOS) with no associated increase of complications or readmission rate. Despite that, FT programs for arthroplasty have has not been uniformly recognized or accepted by many orthopaedic surgeons and there is still no consensus on the best implementation process. The aim of this study was to report the results of a stepwise implementation of a FT regime in TKR and THR patients in a general orthopaedic department.

Material and methods: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data (from 2014 to 2017) concerning all consecutive unselected patients who underwent TKR or THR on Monday morning. At stage 1 the rehabilitation and physiotherapy component was changed, at stage 2 and 3 a patient's blood management program and a pain management program were prospectively recorded (i.e. respectively Patients' demographics, ASA classification, Charlson index, LOS, blood loss, transfusion rate, complications and 30 - day readmissions).

Results: Four hundred and thirty four patients underwent either TKR (n: 302) or THR (n:132) and were included in this study. A gradual reduction of mean LOS was found in THR patients from 5.7 days to 3.0 days and in TKR patients from 5.6 days to 3.4 days. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in complications or regarding the 30-day readmission rate at the different stages of implementation of the different FT components (i.e. at the final stage 96.7% of THR and 86.7% of TKR patients were discharged to home by the fourth post-operative day).

Conclusion: The stepwise implementation of a FT program in an unelected population of THR and TKR patients was effective and safe, reducing the post-surgical recovery time and patients' LOS with no major complications and no increase of 30-day re-admissions.

Keywords: Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-track; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean length of stay (LOS) (A) and LOS up to four days (B) in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients. Step T: Traditionl, P: Physiotherapy, P+BMP: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program, P+BMP+PMR: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program + Pain Management Program.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Transfusion rate (A) and hematological parameters (B) in Total Knee Replacement (TKR) patients. Step T: Traditionl, P: Physiotherapy, P+BMP: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program, P+BMP+PMR: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program + Pain Management Program.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean length of stay (LOS) (A) and LOS up to four days (B) in Total Hip Replacement (THR) patients. Step T: Traditionl, P: Physiotherapy, P+BMP: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program, P+BMP+PMR: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program + Pain Management Program.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Transfusion rate (A) and hematological parameters (B) in Total Hip. Step T: Traditionl, P: Physiotherapy, P+BMP: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program, P+BMP+PMR: Physiotherapy + Blood Management Program + Pain Management Program.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F., Dardennes C., Reginster J.Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 2004;86-a(5):963–974. - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H., Mythen M. Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk? Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(3):289–291. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am Vol. 2007;89(4):780–785. - PubMed
    1. Singh J.A. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:80–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Husted H., Jensen C.M., Solgaard S., Kehlet H. Reduced length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty in Denmark 2000-2009: from research to implementation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(1):101–104. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources