Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;27(4):1148-1154.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

A piece in prostate cancer puzzle: Future perspective of novel molecular signatures

Affiliations
Review

A piece in prostate cancer puzzle: Future perspective of novel molecular signatures

Anmar M Nassir. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a variable biological potential. It constitutes the second most common cancer amongst men worldwide and the fifth most common cancer in Saudi Arabia. Identifying men at higher risk of developing PCa, differentiating indolent from aggressive disease and predicting the likelihood of progression will improve decision-making and selection for active surveillance protocols. Biomarkers have been utilized for PCa screening and predicting cancer behavior and response to treatment. The prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening helps detect PCa in early stages, while implementing a plan for management and outcome. However, PSA screening is still controversial, due to the risks of over diagnosis and treatment, and its inability to detect a good proportion of advanced tumors. Alternatively, a new era of PCa biomarkers has emerged with higher PCa specificity than PSA and its isoforms hopefully improving screening methods, such as Prostate Health Index (PHI) score, Progensa Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 (PCA3), Mi-Prostate Score (MiPS), Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA), 4Kscore test, and Urokinase Plasminogen Activation (uPA and uPAR). Few novel biomarkers have shown promise in preliminary results. This review will display promising biomarkers including some important FDA approved ones, highlighting their clinical implication and future place in the PCa puzzle, along with addressing their current limitations.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prostate cancer biomarker assays and the clinical decision-making.

References

    1. Andreasen P.A., Egelund R., Petersen H.H. The plasminogen activation system in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000;57(1):25–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antica M., Wu L., Scollay R. Stem cell antigen 2 expression in adult and developing mice. Immunol. Lett. 1997;55(1):47–51. - PubMed
    1. Basire A., Sabatier F., Ravet S. High urokinase expression contributes to the angiogenic properties of endothelial cells derived from circulating progenitors. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;95(4):678–688. PMID: 16601839. - PubMed
    1. Benchikh A., Savage C., Cronin A. A panel of kallikrein markers can predict outcome of prostate biopsy following clinical work-up: an independent validation study from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening, France. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:635. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bensalah K., Montorsi F., Shariat S.F. Challenges of cancer biomarker profiling. Eur. Urol. 2007;52:1601–1609. - PubMed