Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 20;31(1):85-97.
eCollection 2020 Mar.

Methods for Hemolysis Interference Study in Laboratory Medicine - A Critical Review

Affiliations
Review

Methods for Hemolysis Interference Study in Laboratory Medicine - A Critical Review

Fernando Marques-Garcia. EJIFCC. .

Abstract

Hemolysis represents an important source of error associated with the pre-analytical phase. Improving the protocols for detection, measurement, management of the parameters affected by the interference, and differentiation between hemolysis in vivo and in vitro, would favor a personalized management of hemolysis by increasing patient safety. For this, it is essential to agree on the definition of "hemolysis". From this definition, a critical point is to establish cut-offs of hemolysis management for each analyte studied in the clinical laboratory. Thus, in this review, the main methods described in the literature developed for obtaining a hemolysate are grouped, that simulate in controlled laboratory protocols what happens with a hemolyzed sample of a patient. These methods are grouped into 3 categories according to their basis of lysing cells: freezing-thawing, osmotic shock and shear stress. In addition to development and improvement of methods for the study of hemolysis, it is necessary to carry out comparative studies to determine which one offers the best capabilities. Harmonization of the methods will allow to include them in working guidelines. All these strategies will allow to move from managing hemolysis on whole-sample basis to customize it analyte by analyte.

Keywords: hemolysis; phlebotomy; preanalytical phase; reproducibility of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010; 47: 101–110. - PubMed
    1. Plebani M, Lippi G. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:1131–1133. - PubMed
    1. Chawla R, Goswami B, Tayal D, Mallika V. Identification of the types of preanalytical errors in the clinical chemistry laboratory: 1-year study at G.B. Pant Hospital. Lab Med. 2010; 41(2):89–92.
    1. Lima-Oliveira G, Volanski W, Lippi G, Picheth G, Guidi GC. Pre-analytical phase management: a review of the procedures from patient preparation to laboratory analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017;77(3):153-163. - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Green S, Kitchen S, Palicka V, Vassault AJ, Plebani M. Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(6):764-772. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources