Segmentation Based on Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility in Relation to Demographical Variables and Personal Values - Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Polish Consumers
- PMID: 32256429
- PMCID: PMC7090225
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00450
Segmentation Based on Attitudes Toward Corporate Social Responsibility in Relation to Demographical Variables and Personal Values - Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Polish Consumers
Abstract
The purpose of the present research was to create market segmentation of Polish consumers that would capture differences in reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), taking into account sociodemographic data and consumers' value structure. In order to better understand the extracted segments, a mixed method approach was adopted. The first quantitative study was conducted on a nationwide representative sample of Poles aged 18-55 years (N = 1055, CAWI survey). A subsequent qualitative stage covered 24 semi-structured in-depth individual interviews, with representatives of each segment identified in Study 1. Consequently, six segments of Poles were extracted and described, differing in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about CSR: Sensible Optimists (15%), Sensitive Intellectuals (18%), Family Pragmatics (21%), Passive Poseurs (19%), Excluded and Frustrated (12%) and Corpo-Egoists (15%). The study showed both demographic and psychological differences in between segments. Segments with positive attitudes toward CSR are more female. Segment of least positive attitudes is manly and youngest one. However, results for age, education level and economic status are less conclusive. Personal values proved to be more useful in understanding different attitudes toward CSR than demography. Segments that are more open to CSR prize self-transcendence and maturity values, while less open segments are more oriented toward social status values.
Keywords: corporate social responsibility; demographical variables; personal values; qualitative study; segmentation study.
Copyright © 2020 Furman, Maison and Sekścińska.
Similar articles
-
Consumers' Corporate Social Responsibility Perception and Anti-Consumer Awareness: Roles of Compassion and Corporate Social Responsibility Authenticity in South Korea.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;13(8):622. doi: 10.3390/bs13080622. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37622762 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer Response to Corporate Hypocrisy From the Perspective of Expectation Confirmation Theory.Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:580114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580114. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33304297 Free PMC article.
-
Interfaces of occupational health management and corporate social responsibility: a multi-centre qualitative study from Germany.BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11016-z. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34078332 Free PMC article.
-
Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Emotional Marketing in Big Data Era: A Mini Literature Review.Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:919601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919601. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35693492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Relationship Between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee-Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 8;12:607108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607108. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34305697 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Responsible consumer and lifestyle: Sustainability insights.Sustain Prod Consum. 2021 Jan;25:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Aug 22. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021. PMID: 32864405 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Andereck K. L., Caldwell L. L. (1994). Variable selection in tourism market segmentation models. J. Travel Res. 33 40–46. 10.1177/004728759403300207 - DOI
-
- Anderson W. T., Cunningham W. (1972). Socially conscious consumer. J. Mark. 36 23–31. 10.1177/002224297203600305 - DOI
-
- Batson C. D., Powell A. A. (2003). “Altruism and prosocial behavior,” in Handbook of Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 5 eds Millon T., Lerner M. J., Weiner I. B. (New York, NY: Wiely; ), 463–484.
-
- Becker-Olsen K. L., Cudmore B. A., Hill R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J. Bus. Res. 59 46–53. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001 - DOI
-
- Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. Calif. Manage. Rev. 47 9–24. 10.2307/41166284 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources