Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 17:11:128.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00128. eCollection 2020.

Monitoring of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

Brynn E Marks et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Regular self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, and ketones when indicated, is an essential component of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. Although fingerstick blood glucose monitoring has been the standard of care for decades, ongoing rapid technological developments have resulted in increasingly widespread use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This article reviews recommendations for self-monitoring of glucose and ketones in pediatric T1D with particular emphasis on CGM and factors that impact the accuracy and real-world use of this technology.

Keywords: blood glucose self monitoring; continuous glucose monitor; diabetes management; ketone; type 1 diabetes (T1D).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of how CGM metrics are displayed in a standardized ambulatory glucose profile (AGP). (A) Average glucose, (B) Time very low (<54 mg/dL), (C) Time low (<70 mg/dL), (D) Time in target range (70–180 mg/dL), (E) Time high (>180 mg/dL), (F) Time very high (> 250 mg/dL), (G) Coefficient of variation, (H) Percentage of time CGM is active. In the top figure, the hatched area shows the target range; composite data for 14-days are shown as median (orange line), interquartile range (blue shaded area), 10 and 90th percentiles (green dashed line). Individual days are shown below.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haller MJ, Stalvey MS, Silverstein JH. Predictors of control of diabetes: monitoring may be the key. J Pediatr. (2004) 144:660–1. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.12.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. (2011) 12:11–7. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00650.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Goland RS, Haller MJ, McGill JB, et al. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoringof blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants. Diabetes Care. (2013) 36:2009–14. 10.2337/dc12-1770 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Becker D, Lamas D, Dunegan C, et al. . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. New Engl. (1993). 329:977–86. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiang JL, Maahs DM, Garvey KC, Hood KK, Laffel LM, Weinzimer SA, et al. . Type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: a position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. (2018) 41:2026–44. 10.2337/dci18-0023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms