Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 17:2020:2052561.
doi: 10.1155/2020/2052561. eCollection 2020.

The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery

Affiliations

The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery

Kuo Zheng et al. Gastroenterol Res Pract. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) count in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients has been rarely evaluated. This study is aimed at exploring the prognostic value of TD count and finding out the optimal cutoff point of TD count to differentiate the prognoses of TD-positive CRC patients.

Method: Patients diagnosed with CRC from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2012, were analyzed. X-tile program was used to identify the optimal cutoff point of TD count in training cohort, and a validation cohort was used to test this cutoff point after propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risk factors of survival.

Results: X-tile plots identified 3 (P < 0.001) as the optimal cutoff point of TD count to divide the patients of training cohort into high and low risk subsets in terms of disease-specific survival (DSS). This cutoff point was validated in validation cohort before and after PSM (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). More TD count, which was defined as more than 3, was validated as an independent risk prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: More TD count (TD count ≥ 4) was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival in CRC patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Division of patients in training cohort by the optimal cutoff point for the TD counts produced by X-tile plot. The optimal cutoff point highlighted by the black circle (a) is shown on a histogram of the training cohort (b) and a Kaplan-Meier plot (c). P values were determined using the cutoff point defined in the training cohort and applying it to the validation set. (The optimal cutoff point for TD count is 3, χ2 = 21.756, P < 0.001.).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Log-rank tests of DSS comparing patients with TDs (1-3 vs. ≥4) before (a) and after (b) PSM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller K. D., Nogueira L., Mariotto A. B., et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019;69(5):363–385. doi: 10.3322/caac.21565. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A., Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamas K., Walenkamp A. M., de Vries E. G., et al. Rectal and colon cancer: not just a different anatomic site. Cancer treatment reviews. 2015;41(8):671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen V. W., Hsieh M. C., Charlton M. E., et al. Analysis of stage and clinical/prognostic factors for colon and rectal cancer from SEER registries: AJCC and collaborative stage data collection system. Cancer. 2014;120:3793–3806. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edge S. B., Compton C. C. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the future of TNM. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010;17(6, article 985):1471–1474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources