Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 19:2020:9523127.
doi: 10.1155/2020/9523127. eCollection 2020.

Overview of "Systematic Reviews" of the Built Environment's Effects on Mental Health

Affiliations
Review

Overview of "Systematic Reviews" of the Built Environment's Effects on Mental Health

Solange Núñez-González et al. J Environ Public Health. .

Abstract

Good mental health is related to mental and psychological well-being, and there is growing interest in the potential role of the built environment on mental health, yet the evidence base underpinning the direct or indirect effects of the built environment is not fully clear. The aim of this overview is to assess the effect of the built environment on mental health-related outcomes. Methods. This study provides an overview of published systematic reviews (SRs) that assess the effect of the built environment on mental health. We reported the overview according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases searched until November 2019 included the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID 1946 to present), LILACS, and PsycINFO. Two authors independently selected reviews, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included reviews using the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2). Results. In total, 357 records were identified from a structured search of five databases combined with the references of the included studies, and eleven SRs were included in the narrative synthesis. Outcomes included mental health and well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress. According to AMSTAR-2 scores, the quality assessment of the included SRs was categorized as "high" in two SRs and as "critically low" in nine SRs. According to the conclusions of the SRs reported by the authors, only one SR reported a "beneficial" effect on mental health and well-being outcomes. Conclusion. There was insufficient evidence to make firm conclusions on the effects of built environment interventions on mental health outcomes (well-being, depression and stress, and psychological distress). The evidence collected reported high heterogeneity (outcomes and measures) and a moderate- to low-quality assessment among the included SRs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Promoting mental health concepts emerging evidence practice summary report. 2004. https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/en/promoting_mhh.pdf.
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report: mental health: new understanding, new hope. 2001. https://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/whr01_en.pdf?ua=1.
    1. World Health Organization. mhGAP operations manual mental health gap action programme. 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/275386/9789241514811-en....
    1. Vigo D., Thornicroft G., Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00505-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lancet Global Mental Health Group. Scale up services for mental disorders: a call for action. The Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1241–1252. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61242-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types