The efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and left-side double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation under the guidance of chest CT
- PMID: 32256757
- PMCID: PMC7086194
- DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8492
The efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and left-side double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation under the guidance of chest CT
Abstract
One-lung ventilation (OLV) is essential in numerous clinical procedures, in which the left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is the most commonly used device. The application of bronchial blockers, including the Uniblocker or Arndt blocker, has increased in OLV. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and LDLT for OLV under the guidance of chest CT. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing elective left-side thoracic surgery requiring OLV were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to the Uniblocker group (U group, n=30) or the LDLT group (D group, n=30). The time for initial tube placement, the number of optimal positions of the tube upon blind insertion, the number of attempts to adjust the tube to the optimal position, incidence of airway device displacement, injury to the bronchi and carina, the duration until lung collapse and the occurrence of sore throat and hoarseness over 24 h following surgery were recorded. The time for successful placement of the LDLT was 83.9±19.4 sec and that for the Uniblocker was 84.3±17.1 sec (P>0.05). The degree of lung collapse 1 min following opening of the pleura was greater in the D group than that in the U group (P<0.01) and the time required for the lung to completely collapse was shorter in the D group (3.3±0.5 min) than that in the U group (8.4±1.2 min; P<0.01). On the contrary, the incidence of injury to the bronchi and carina was lower in the U group (2/30 cases) than in the D group (10/30 cases; P=0.02); the incidence of sore throat was also lower in the U group (2/30 cases) compared with that in the D group (9/30 cases). The mean arterial pressure of patients immediately following intubation was lower in the U group (122.0±13.4 mmHg) than that in the D group (129.2±12.1 mmHg; P<0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the extraluminal use of the Uniblocker under guidance of chest CT is an efficient method with few adverse effects in left-side thoracic surgery. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 16th December 2017 (no. NCT03392922).
Keywords: Uniblocker; double-lumen tube; intubation; thoracic surgery.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A comparison of extraluminal and intraluminal use of the Uniblocker in left thoracic surgery: A CONSORT-compliant article.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6966. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006966. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28538393 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A novel method of Uniblocker placement: extraluminal technique supported by trachea length measurement: A CONSORT-compliant article.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15116. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015116. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30946382 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The feasibility and accuracy of the method for selecting the optimal size of double-lumen tube in thoracic surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17539. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68349-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39080380 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Left-Sided Double-Lumen Tube vs EZ-Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Sep;27(3):171-180. doi: 10.1177/10892532231184781. Epub 2023 Jun 22. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023. PMID: 37347963
-
[Airway management for lung separation in thoracic surgery : An update].Anaesthesist. 2018 Aug;67(8):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s00101-018-0470-1. Anaesthesist. 2018. PMID: 30083992 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The impact of suction duration on lung collapse during one-lung ventilation.Front Surg. 2025 Mar 31;12:1532176. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1532176. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40230709 Free PMC article.
-
Double-lumen tubes verus single-lumen tube in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled clinical trial.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 24;12:1583360. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1583360. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40777565 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficiency and Safety of Double-Lumen Tube and Bronchial Blocker for One-Lung Ventilation.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 27;12(5):1877. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051877. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902663 Free PMC article. Review.
-
3D CT airway evaluation-guided intraluminal placement of endobronchial blocker in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled study.Transl Pediatr. 2021 Mar;10(3):625-634. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-33. Transl Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33850821 Free PMC article.
-
One-lung ventilation with a bronchial blocker in thoracic patients.BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02362-z. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 38057754 Free PMC article.
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical