Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;19(4):2751-2756.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8492. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

The efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and left-side double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation under the guidance of chest CT

Affiliations

The efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and left-side double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation under the guidance of chest CT

Zhuo Liu et al. Exp Ther Med. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

One-lung ventilation (OLV) is essential in numerous clinical procedures, in which the left-sided double-lumen tube (LDLT) is the most commonly used device. The application of bronchial blockers, including the Uniblocker or Arndt blocker, has increased in OLV. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of the Uniblocker and LDLT for OLV under the guidance of chest CT. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing elective left-side thoracic surgery requiring OLV were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to the Uniblocker group (U group, n=30) or the LDLT group (D group, n=30). The time for initial tube placement, the number of optimal positions of the tube upon blind insertion, the number of attempts to adjust the tube to the optimal position, incidence of airway device displacement, injury to the bronchi and carina, the duration until lung collapse and the occurrence of sore throat and hoarseness over 24 h following surgery were recorded. The time for successful placement of the LDLT was 83.9±19.4 sec and that for the Uniblocker was 84.3±17.1 sec (P>0.05). The degree of lung collapse 1 min following opening of the pleura was greater in the D group than that in the U group (P<0.01) and the time required for the lung to completely collapse was shorter in the D group (3.3±0.5 min) than that in the U group (8.4±1.2 min; P<0.01). On the contrary, the incidence of injury to the bronchi and carina was lower in the U group (2/30 cases) than in the D group (10/30 cases; P=0.02); the incidence of sore throat was also lower in the U group (2/30 cases) compared with that in the D group (9/30 cases). The mean arterial pressure of patients immediately following intubation was lower in the U group (122.0±13.4 mmHg) than that in the D group (129.2±12.1 mmHg; P<0.05). The results of the present study indicated that the extraluminal use of the Uniblocker under guidance of chest CT is an efficient method with few adverse effects in left-side thoracic surgery. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 16th December 2017 (no. NCT03392922).

Keywords: Uniblocker; double-lumen tube; intubation; thoracic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Vocal cords and (B) carina on chest CT images. (C and D) A marker on (C) the left-sided double-lumen tube and (D) the Uniblocker.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) Camera view during intubation by the video laryngoscope and the marker on the left-sided double-lumen tube. (B) Camera view during intubation via the video laryngoscope and the marker on the Uniblocker just above the vocal cords. (C) Cuff of the left-sided double-lumen tube located below the carina under the view of FOB. (D) Cuff of the Uniblocker located below the carina under the view of FOB. FOB, fiberoptic bronchoscope.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shelley B, Macfie A, Kinsella J. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery: A survey of UK practice. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:1014–1017. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.06.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Della Rocca G, Langiano N, Baroselli A, Granzotti S, Pravisani C. Survey of thoracic anesthetic practice in Italy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:1321–1329. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.03.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angie Ho CY, Chen CY, Yang MW, Liu HP. CY AH: Use of the Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker via nasal for one-lung ventilation in patient with anticipated restricted mouth opening for esophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:174–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campos JH. An update on bronchial blockers during lung separation techniques in adults. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1266–1274. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000085301.87286.59. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Narayanaswamy M, McRae K, Slinger P, Dugas G, Kanellakos GW, Roscoe A, Lacroix M. Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: A randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1097–1101. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181999339. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data