Use of the new rotating dilator sheath TightRail™ for lead extraction: A bicentric experience
- PMID: 32256885
- PMCID: PMC7132215
- DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12310
Use of the new rotating dilator sheath TightRail™ for lead extraction: A bicentric experience
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the new bidirectional rotational mechanical sheath TightRail™ (Spectranetics) for lead extraction.
Methods and results: This is a bicentric prospective study that included patients who underwent a transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in two Italian centers (San Raffaele Hospital and Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital). From November 2016 to December 2018, 26 patients underwent a TLE procedure in which the TightRail™ was used. The new TightRail Sub-C was used in 20 (76%) patients to overcome the fibrosis between the vessel and the first rib. Median age was 69 (IQR 60.7-79.5) years. The indication for TLE were infection (57.7%) or lead dysfunction (42.3%). A total of 57 leads (range 1-4), 40 of which using the TightRail (range 1-4), were extracted. Overall mean implant duration was 98.2.0 ± 66.5 months. Mean age of the lead extracted with the TightRail sheath was 99.1 ± 70.2 months and was higher compared to that of the leads extracted manually (84.4 ± 60.3 months, P = .001). The overall clinical success was 100% and complete procedural success without the use of a snare was achieved in 98.3%. There were no cases of death or major complications and only two minor complications occurred. All patients were event-free at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: This initial experience using the TightRail™ suggests a high safety and efficacy profile for extractions in a wide range of lead age.
Keywords: lead extraction; rotational sheath.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Initial experience with the TightRail™ Rotating Mechanical Dilator Sheath for transvenous lead extraction.Europace. 2016 Jul;18(7):1043-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv245. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Europace. 2016. PMID: 26467403
-
Outcomes of transvenous lead extraction using the TightRail™ mechanical rotating dilator sheath and excimer laser sheath.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jul;32(7):1969-1978. doi: 10.1111/jce.15105. Epub 2021 Jun 1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34028112
-
Comparison of acute and long-term outcomes of Evolution® and TightRail™ mechanical dilator sheaths during transvenous lead extraction.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 May;32(5):1395-1404. doi: 10.1111/jce.15006. Epub 2021 Mar 25. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33724617
-
Active fixation mechanism complicates coronary sinus lead extraction and limits subsequent reimplantation targets.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Jan;36(1):81-6; discussion 86. doi: 10.1007/s10840-012-9704-3. Epub 2012 Aug 7. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013. PMID: 22869386 Review.
-
Comparison of non-laser and laser transvenous lead extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace. 2023 Nov 2;25(11):euad316. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad316. Europace. 2023. PMID: 37882609 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Working on the dirty side-the ipsilateral subclavian access for temporary pacing after lead extraction.J Arrhythm. 2022 Feb 4;38(2):192-198. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12677. eCollection 2022 Apr. J Arrhythm. 2022. PMID: 35387138 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice.J Clin Med. 2024 May 4;13(9):2707. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092707. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38731236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):402-407. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa278. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33257960 Free PMC article.
-
Transvenous lead extraction outcomes using a novel hand-powered bidirectional rotational sheath as a first-line extraction tool in a low-volume centre.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Apr 8;32(3):395-401. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa286. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33249479 Free PMC article.
-
Transvenous Lead Extraction: Work in Progress.Eur Cardiol. 2023 Jun 19;18:e44. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.06. eCollection 2023. Eur Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37456768 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Maytin M, Epstein LM. Lead extraction is preferred for lead revisions and system upgrades when less is more. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(4):413–24. - PubMed
-
- Bongiorni MG, Kennergren C, Butter C, Deharo JC, Kutarski A, Rinaldi CA, et al. The European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) study: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) registry of transvenous lead extraction outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2017;28:180–4. - PubMed
-
- Wilkoff BL, Byrd CL, Love CJ, Hayes DL, Sellers TD, Schaerf R, et al. Pacemaker lead extraction with the laser sheath: results of the pacing lead extraction with the excimer sheath (PLEXES) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1671–6. - PubMed
-
- Kennergren C, Bucknall CA, Butter C, Charles R, Fuhrer J, Grosfeld M, et al. Laser‐assisted lead extraction: the European experience. Europace. 2007;9(8):651–6. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources