Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1;8(1):17.
doi: 10.1007/s13755-020-00109-5. eCollection 2020 Dec.

A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation

Marzieh Esmaeili  1   2 , Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh  1   2 , Nasrin Ahmadinejad  3   4 , Marjan Ghazisaeedi  1 , Azin Nahvijou  5 , Keivan Maghooli  6
Affiliations

A decision support system for mammography reports interpretation

Marzieh Esmaeili et al. Health Inf Sci Syst. .

Abstract

Purpose: Mammography plays a key role in the diagnosis of breast cancer; however, decision-making based on mammography reports is still challenging. This paper aims to addresses the challenges regarding decision-making based on mammography reports and propose a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) using data mining methods to help clinicians to interpret mammography reports.

Methods: For this purpose, 2441 mammography reports were collected from Imam Khomeini Hospital from March 21, 2018, to March 20, 2019. In the first step, these mammography reports are analyzed and program code is developed to transform the reports into a dataset. Then, the weight of every feature of the dataset is calculated. Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor (K-NN), Deep Learning classifiers are applied to the dataset to build a model capable of predicting the need for referral to biopsy. Afterward, the models are evaluated using cross-validation with measuring Area Under Curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity indices.

Results: The mammography type (diagnostic or screening), mass and calcification features mentioned in the reports are the most important features for decision-making. Results reveal that the K-NN model is the most accurate and specific classifier with the accuracy and specificity values of 84.06% and 84.72% respectively. The Random Forest classifier has the best sensitivity and AUC with the sensitivity and AUC values of 87.74% and 0.905 respectively.

Conclusions: Accordingly, data mining approaches are proved to be a helpful tool to make the final decision as to whether patients should be referred to biopsy or not based on mammography reports. The developed CDSS may also be helpful especially for less experienced radiologists.

Keywords: BI-RADS; Breast cancer; CDSS; Data mining; Mammography report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall steps of performing current research
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The weight of the features for detecting the need for referral to biopsy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. 2018;68(6):394–424. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–1953. - PubMed
    1. Mandelblatt JS, et al. Collaborative modeling of the benefits and harms associated with different US breast cancer screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):215–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding C, et al. Long-term relationships between screening rates, breast cancer characteristics, and overdiagnosis in US counties, 1975–2009. J Cancer. 2019;144(3):476–488. - PubMed
    1. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) Radiol Clin. 2002;40(3):409–430. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources