Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;10(1):010401.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010401.

A nationwide analysis of the excess death attributable to diabetes in Brazil

Affiliations

A nationwide analysis of the excess death attributable to diabetes in Brazil

Paula A Bracco et al. J Glob Health. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Data on mortality burden and excess deaths attributable to diabetes are sparse and frequently unreliable, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Estimates in Brazil to date have relied on death certificate data, which do not consider the multicausal nature of deaths. Our aim was to combine cohort data with national prevalence and mortality statistics to estimate the absolute number of deaths that could have been prevented if the mortality rates of people with diabetes were the same as for those without. In addition, we aimed to estimate the increase in burden when considering undiagnosed diabetes.

Methods: We estimated self-reported diabetes prevalence from the National Health Survey (PNS) and overall mortality from the national mortality information system (SIM). We estimated the diabetes mortality rate ratio (rates of those with vs without diabetes) from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), an ongoing cohort study. Joining estimates from these three sources, we calculated for the population the absolute number and the fraction of deaths attributable to diabetes. We repeated our analyses considering both self-reported and unknown diabetes, the latter estimated based on single point-in-time glycemic determinations in ELSA-Brasil. Finally, we compared results with diabetes-related mortality information from death certificates.

Results: In 2013, 65 581 deaths, 9.1% of all deaths between the ages of 35-80, were attributable to known diabetes. If cases of unknown diabetes were considered, this figure would rise to 14.3%. In contrast, based on death certificates only, 5.3% of all death had diabetes as the underlying cause and 10.4% as any mentioned cause.

Conclusions: In this first report of diabetes mortality burden in Brazil using cohort data to estimate diabetes mortality rate ratios and the prevalence of unknown diabetes, we showed marked underestimation of the current burden, especially when unknown cases of diabetes are also considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes (%) for Brazilian men (dashed line; blue) and women (solid line; red). National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, PNS), Brazil, 2013.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted mortality rate ratio (diabetes vs non-diabetes) (adjusted for ethnicity, educational level, income, smoking status, BMI and waist circumference). Panel A. Self-reported. Panel B. Self-reported plus undiagnosed diabetes. Men – black line, for men, blue confidence zone, women – red line, pink confidence zone. Estimates between ages 75 and 80 years old (small dashed lines) are extrapolations. ELSA-Brasil, 2008-2018.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mortality rates. Panel A. Self-reported. Panel B. Self-reported plus undiagnosed diabetes. Men – black lines, women – red lines. Dashed lines represent mortality of those without diabetes. Brazil, 2013.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2017. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2017.
    1. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. VIGITEL Brasil 2016: Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico [Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases, Vigitel,2016]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2017.
    1. Duncan BB, Schmidt MI.Ewerton Cousin, Moradi-Lakeh M, Passos VM de A, França EB, et al. The burden of diabetes and hyperglycemia in Brazil-past and present: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2017;9:18. 10.1186/s13098-017-0216-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2015. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
    1. Saydah SH, Geiss LS, Tierney E, Benjamin SM, Engelgau M, Brancati F.Review of the performance of methods to identify diabetes cases among vital statistics, administrative, and survey data. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:507-16. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.016 - DOI - PubMed