Political challenges to prioritizing gender in global health organisations
- PMID: 32257162
- PMCID: PMC7101082
- DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.010702
Political challenges to prioritizing gender in global health organisations
Abstract
Background: Many global health organisations have adopted formal strategies to integrate gender in their programming. In practice, few prioritise the issue. Institutions with considerable global power therefore largely overlook fundamental drivers of adverse health outcomes: gender inequality and harmful gender norms. We analyse the factors shaping attention to gender in organisations involved in global health governance.
Methods: Drawing on scholarship from the fields of organisational behavior and management, sociology, international relations and the policy process, we undertook a thematic analysis of peer-reviewed scholarship and organisational documents. We also conducted 20 semi-structured interviews over Skype with individuals working at the cross-section of gender and health.
Results: In seeking to reform the policies and practices of global health organisations, gender proponents confront patriarchal organisational cultures, hostile political environments and an issue that is difficult to address as it requires upsetting existing power structures. Proponents also face three linked challenges internal to their own networks. First, there is little cohesion among champions themselves, as they are fragmented into multiple networks. Second, proponents differ on the nature of the problem and solutions, including whether reducing gender inequality or addressing harmful gender norms is the primary goal, the role of men in gender initiatives, which health issues to prioritise, and even the value of proponent cohesion. Third, there are disagreements among proponents on how to convey the problem. Some advance an instrumental case, while others believe that it should be portrayed as a human rights issue and using any other argument undermines that fundamental justification.
Conclusions: Prospects for building more gender-responsive global health organisations will depend in part on the ability of proponents to address these disagreements and develop strategies for negotiating difficult organisational cultures and political environments.
Copyright © 2020 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Generation of political priority for global surgery: a qualitative policy analysis.Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Aug;3(8):e487-e495. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00098-4. Lancet Glob Health. 2015. PMID: 26187491
-
Generating Global Priority for Addressing Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Qualitative Policy Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e014800. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014800. Epub 2020 Apr 20. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32308101 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Generation of global political priority for early childhood development: the challenges of framing and governance.Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):119-124. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31574-4. Epub 2016 Oct 4. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 27717613
-
Power and Politics in the Global Health Landscape: Beliefs, Competition and Negotiation Among Global Advocacy Coalitions in the Policy-Making Process.Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jan 30;5(5):309-20. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.03. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016. PMID: 27239880 Free PMC article.
-
Framing and the formation of global health priorities.Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1977-1990. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00584-0. Epub 2022 May 17. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35594874 Review.
Cited by
-
A shared agenda for gender and COVID-19 research: priorities based on broadening engagement in science.BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5):e011315. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011315. BMJ Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37217235 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing priority received by global health issues: a measurement framework applied to tuberculosis, malaria, diarrhoeal diseases and dengue fever.BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jul 8;9(7):e014884. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014884. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 38977402 Free PMC article.
-
A global priority: addressing violence against children.Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Jun 1;99(6):414-421. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.247874. Epub 2021 Mar 21. Bull World Health Organ. 2021. PMID: 34108751 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle.Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241288346. doi: 10.1177/00469580241288346. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 39385394 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mainstreaming Gender-Responsive One Health: Now Is the Time.Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;10:845866. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.845866. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35903392 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Global Health 50/50 ‘The Global Health 50/50 Report: How gender-responsive are the world’s most influential global health organisations?. London, UK; 2018. Available: https://globalhealth5050.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/GH5050-Report-20.... Accessed: 17April 2018.
-
- Rao A, Sandler J, Kelleher D, Miller C. Gender at work: Theory and practice for 21st century organizations. London: Routledge; 2015.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical