Effective approaches to public engagement with global health topics
- PMID: 32257175
- PMCID: PMC7101214
- DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.010901
Effective approaches to public engagement with global health topics
Abstract
Background: "Public engagement" in science is a term that covers a broad spectrum of activities undertaken by the scientific community. The precise definitions are constantly evolving to incorporate new means of engagement, facilitated by emerging technologies. Global health research is amenable to community engagement and popularization, but it is difficult to know which strategies work best to attract considerable attention from the public.
Methods: This is a review of the articles and documents that address the question of public engagement with topics in medical sciences, particularly in global health. Semantic searches were conducted using Google Scholar rather than indexed databases due to poor indexing of the topic. More than 1000 titles were screened and 48 articles were retained as most useful. It then moves to a more specific topic of the online public engagement in global health.
Results: The review presents the attempts to define public engagement in science and its general importance, particularly in the field of global health. Examples of the latter include tobacco use, vaccination, and maternal and child health. In reviewing effective approaches to public engagement in global health through online video campaigns, it studies the examples of crowdfunding, USAID's First Public Engagement Campaign, World Health Organization's Social Media Campaigns and the impact of Global Health Media Project.
Conclusions: This review reveals three key gaps in the understanding of determinants of effective online public engagement in global health. The mixed results of traditional mass media campaigns in global health emphasise the calls for more research on message content. A framework for effective message content would help in both raising awareness of key issues and creating behaviour change in the general public. Moreover, it is surprising to find no formal research on what constitutes effective video content in global health. Finally, few studies considered important metrics to track in social media campaigns. There is a clear need to investigate which video features are effective in global health online public engagement. Success will be defined through key video marketing metrics and tracked in order to isolate effective content features.
Copyright © 2020 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Igor Rudan is a Co-Editors in Chief of the Journal of Global Health. To ensure that any possible conflict of interest relevant to the journal has been addressed, this article was reviewed according to best practice guidelines of international editorial organisations. The authors have completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
A systematic analysis of online public engagement with 10 videos on major global health topics involving 229 459 global online viewers.J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010903. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010903. J Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32257172 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Evaluation Metrics Used in Digital and Traditional Tobacco Control Campaigns.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17432. doi: 10.2196/17432. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32348272 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Earned media and public engagement with CDC's "Tips from Former Smokers" campaign: an analysis of online news and blog coverage.J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 20;17(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3645. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25604520 Free PMC article.
-
Just telling and selling: current limitations in the use of digital media in public health: a scoping review.Public Health. 2014 Dec;128(12):1066-75. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Nov 24. Public Health. 2014. PMID: 25443388
-
"The potential of social media in health promotion beyond creating awareness: an integrative review".BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):2402. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14885-0. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36544121 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Digital Formats for Community Participation in Health Promotion and Prevention Activities: A Scoping Review.Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;9:713159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.713159. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34869143 Free PMC article.
-
Animations to communicate public health prevention messages: a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e083013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083013. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39122406 Free PMC article.
-
The positive impact of introducing public engagement as a self-directed learning strategy in undergraduate nervous system education.Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2383017. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2383017. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Med Educ Online. 2024. PMID: 39074247 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting global health education: The engagement of medical students.J Glob Health. 2023 Nov 3;13:03059. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.03059. J Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37917877 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Analysis of public engagement with ten major global health topics on a social network profile and a newspaper website.J Glob Health. 2020 Jun;10(1):010902. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.010902. J Glob Health. 2020. PMID: 32257171 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Publicengagement.ac.uk. What is public engagement? | NCCPE. 2017. Available: http://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/explore-it/what-public-engagement. Accessed: 3 March 2017.
-
- HEFC. Public Engagement - Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2017. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/publicengage/. Accessed: 3 March 2017.
-
- Research Councils U.K. Concordat for Engaging the Public with Research. London: RCUK; 2010.
-
- Knox J.Digital culture clash: “massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Educ. 2014;35:164-77. 10.1080/01587919.2014.917704 - DOI
-
- Funk C, Rainie L. Public and scientists’ views on science and society. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech, 2017. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-sci.... Accessed: 3 March 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical