SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF POST-PROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE
- PMID: 32257247
- PMCID: PMC7133707
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF POST-PROSTATECTOMY INCONTINENCE
Abstract
Post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is a common and significant issue that can affect the quality of life in men who are undergoing treatment for prostate cancer. While some patients opt for conservative management of their incontinence, many elect to undergo surgical treatment as a result of the significant impact to quality of life. The most commonly employed surgical techniques to address PPI are placement of a male sling or artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). Currently, the AUS continues to serve as the gold standard for management, with robust data concerning longitudinal outcomes available. However, in recent years, the various methods to place the male sling have emerged as viable, less complex alternatives that avoid the need for pump manipulation. In the present review, we discuss these main surgical treatment modalities for PPI, and focus on the selection criteria that may influence appropriate operative stratification of PPI patients. Indeed, an individualised, comprehensive assessment of baseline urinary function, age, radiation, prior surgeries, functional status, and other comorbidities must be considered in the context of shared decision-making between the treatment provider and the patient in determining the optimal approach to managing PPI.
Keywords: Urinary incontinence; artificial urinary sphincter (AUS); male sling; prostatectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of post prostatectomy incontinence.Prostate Int. 2024 Jun;12(2):65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 Apr 27. Prostate Int. 2024. PMID: 39036757 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.BJU Int. 2021 Feb;127(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/bju.15197. Epub 2020 Aug 26. BJU Int. 2021. PMID: 32744793
-
Comparing Argus sling and artificial urinary sphincter in patients with moderate post-prostatectomy incontinence.J Exerc Rehabil. 2014 Oct 31;10(5):337-42. doi: 10.12965/jer.140152. eCollection 2014 Oct. J Exerc Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 25426474 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns and timing of artificial urinary sphincter failure.World J Urol. 2018 Jun;36(6):939-945. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2203-0. Epub 2018 Jan 30. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29383481
-
Surgery Insight: surgical management of postprostatectomy incontinence--the artificial urinary sphincter and male sling.Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 Nov;4(11):615-24. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0935. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007. PMID: 17982438 Review.
References
-
- Groutz A et al. The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1767–70. - PubMed
-
- Boorjian SA et al. A critical analysis of the long-term impact of radical prostatectomy on cancer control and function outcomes. Eur Urol. 2012; 61(4):664–75. - PubMed
-
- Crivellaro S et al. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
-
- Tewari AK et al. Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing. World J Urol. 2013;31(3):471–80. - PubMed
-
- Penson DF et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. J Urol. 2008; 179(5 Suppl):S40–4. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources