Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 16:6:e01.
doi: 10.15420/cfr.2019.02. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure

Affiliations
Review

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure

Federica Jiritano et al. Card Fail Rev. .

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a challenging syndrome, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although pharmacological therapies are successful and can successfully control this acute cardiac illness, some patients remain refractory to drugs. Therefore, a more aggressive treatment strategy is needed. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (TCS) can be used to stabilise patients with decompensated heart failure. In the last two decades, the increased use of TCS has led to several kinds of devices becoming available. However, indications for TCS and device selection are part of a complex process. It is necessary to evaluate the severity of CS, any early and prompt haemodynamic resuscitation, prior TCS, specific patient risk factors, technical limitations and adequacy of resources and training, as well as an assessment of whether care would be futile. This article examines options for commonly used TCS devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps, a pulsatile percutaneous ventricular assist device (the iVAC), veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella (Abiomed) and TandemHeart (LivaNova) percutaneous ventricular assist device.

Keywords: Temporary mechanical circulation; acute heart failure; extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation; intra-aortic balloon pump; left ventricular assist device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Temporary Ventricular Assist Devices

References

    1. Mebazaa A, Combes A, Van Diepen S et al. Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:760–73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5214-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:e232–68. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Esposito ML, Kapur NK. Acute mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: the “door to support” time. F1000Res. 2017;6:737. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11150.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kantrowitz A, Tjonneland S, Freed PS et al. Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping on cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 1968;203:113–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.203.2.113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stretch R, Sauer CM, Yuh DD et al. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1407–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources