Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Mar 21:11:52.
doi: 10.25259/SNI_49_2020. eCollection 2020.

Failure of C2-3 anterior arthrodesis for the treatment of atypical Hangman's fractures: A three case series

Affiliations
Case Reports

Failure of C2-3 anterior arthrodesis for the treatment of atypical Hangman's fractures: A three case series

Zaid Aljuboori et al. Surg Neurol Int. .

Abstract

Background: Hangman's fractures (HF) are defined by bilateral fractures of pars interarticularis of the axis. Most can be treated with a collar. However, the treatment strategies for atypical HF (AHF) involve the pedicles, are unstable, and require fusion. Here, we present three cases of AHF that failed anterior arthrodesis warranting repeat anterior (one case), and posterior fusions (three cases).

Case description: One female and two males, ranging from 48 to 69 years of age, presented with AHF. All three were originally treated with C2-3 anterior cervical discectomy/fusion, and all three failed (e.g., resulted in pseudarthrosis/ anterolisthesis/instability). The first patient required a secondary C3 corpectomy/C2-4 arthrodesis, with C1-C4 posterior instrumentation. The latter two patients required secondary C1-C3 posterior fusions. For all three patients, 3-12 months follow-up X-rays confirmed the excellent alignment of the instrumentation and bony fusion.

Conclusion: Anterior arthrodesis can be utilized to treat AHF, but often fail when addressing AHF. All AHF warranted secondary posterior fusions (e.g., C1-C3 two cases; and C1-C4 one case) and a subset may additionally require more extensive anterior fusions (e.g., C2-C4 with corpectomy of C3).

Keywords: Anterolisthesis; Arthrodesis; Atypical; Hangman’s fracture; Instrumentation; Spine; Trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
CT C-spine [axial] shows (a) left pars fracture, (b) bilateral pedicle fracture, (c) bilateral pedicle fracture.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
C-spine X-ray [lateral] shows (a) C2-3 arthrodesis with new anterolisthesis, (b) C2-3 arthrodesis with new anterolisthesis, (c) CT C-spine [sagittal] shows new C2-3 anterolisthesis.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
C-spine X-ray [lateral] shows (a) C3 corpectomy with C2-4 anterior and C1-C4 posterior arthrodesis, (b) reduction of C2-3 with C1-C3 posterior arthrodesis, (c) reduction of C2-3 with C1-C3 posterior arthrodesis.

References

    1. Al-Mahfoudh R, Beagrie C, Woolley E, Zakaria R, Radon M, Clark S, et al. Management of typical and atypical hangman’s fractures. Global Spine J. 2016;6:248–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hakało J, Wroński J. Operative treatment of hangman’s fractures of C2. Posterior direct pars screw repair or anterior plate-cage stabilization? Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2008;42:28–36. - PubMed
    1. Han K, Cui SB, Wang L, Wei FX, Liu SY. Traumatic bilateral atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation with hangman fracture in an adult. Neurol India. 2016;64:811–4. - PubMed
    1. Karthigeyan M, Rangan V, Salunke P. A case of traumatic C2-3 listhesis without pars fracture: Insights from this possible variant of hangman’s fracture. Neurol India. 2017;65:209–11. - PubMed
    1. Li G, Zhong D, Wang Q. A novel classification for atypical hangman fractures and its application: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e7492. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources