Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;9(Suppl 2):S215-S226.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.28.

Fertility preservation options for transgender individuals

Affiliations
Review

Fertility preservation options for transgender individuals

Joshua Sterling et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Gender affirming medical and surgical treatments affect the reproductive potential of transgender individuals. Prior to the development of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), genital gender-affirming surgery frequently eliminated a patient's reproductive potential. Today, all patients should be counseled on their fertility preservation (FP) options before medical and surgical transition, yet this appears to seldom occur in practice. The following review is the result of a systematic literature search of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar to identify current and future FP options, barriers to treatment patients face, practice patterns of transgender health care providers, and if there were any standardized counseling protocols. Options for transwomen at any point in their transition range from simply providing a semen sample to be used with assistive reproductive techniques to experimental techniques involving testicular cryopreservation followed by in vitro initiation of spermatogenesis. Transmen before and after starting hormone therapy can pursue any assistive reproductive techniques available for ciswomen. Future options currently under investigation include ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) with in vitro oocyte maturation. In addition to counseling about their FP options, patients should be advised prospectively about the requirements, process details, the total costs associated with achieving pregnancy, and the inherent risks associated with using preserved genetic material including risk of failure, and maternal and fetal health risks. Transgender patients report using assistive reproductive services difficult, due to a lack of dialogue about fertility and the lack of information offered to them- presumably because their circumstances do not fit into a traditional narrative familiar to providers. Physicians and health care providers would benefit from better educational tools to help transgender patients make informed decisions and better training about transgender patients in general, and FP options available to them.

Keywords: Fertility preservation (FP); assistive reproductive technologies; trans female; trans male; transgender health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The focused issue “Contemporary Issues and Controversies in Men’s Health” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dunne P. YY v Turkey: infertility as a pre-condition for gender confirmation surgery. Med Law Rev 2015;23:646-58. 10.1093/medlaw/fwv019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Professional Association for Transgender Health EMRWG. Standards of care for health of transsexual, transgender, and gender nonconforming people, 7th version 2011.
    1. Murphy TF. The ethics of fertility preservation in transgender body modifications. J Bioeth Inq 2012;9:311-6. 10.1007/s11673-012-9378-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiniara LN, Viner C, Palmert M, et al. Perspectives on fertility preservation and parenthood among transgender youth and their parents. Arch Dis Child 2019;104:739-44. 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316080 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldman RH, Kaser DJ, Missmer SA, et al. Fertility treatment for the transgender community: a public opinion study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017;34:1457-67. 10.1007/s10815-017-1035-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed