Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar;9(Suppl 2):S227-S238.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.27.

Oncofertility in adult and pediatric populations: options and barriers

Affiliations
Review

Oncofertility in adult and pediatric populations: options and barriers

Joshua A Halpern et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Cancer and its treatments can affect fertility in a variety of ways, and recent advances in cancer detection and treatment have led to an increasing number of cancer survivors for whom future fertility is a primary concern. Oncofertility is the study of interactions between cancer, anti-cancer therapy, fertility, and reproductive health. Fertility preservation aims to optimize fertility potential before initiation of gonadotoxic therapies. Sperm cryopreservation from an ejaculated sample is the gold standard for adults and post-pubertal adolescents, though added maneuvers such as medical therapy, penile vibratory stimulation, and electroejaculation can be employed when appropriate. When all these approaches fail, testicular sperm extraction can be used to obtain and cryopreserve testicular sperm from the azoospermic patient. Fertility preservation in the pre-pubertal pediatric patient is still experimental, but recent scientific breakthroughs with use of spermatogonial stem cells and testicular tissue transplantation offer great promise for the future. While there may be several practical, cultural, religious, and other barriers to fertility preservation, the establishment of a dedicated fertility preservation team can help to overcome these obstacles and optimize the utilization of fertility preservation in cancer patients of all ages.

Keywords: Azoospermia; fertility preservation; oncofertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The focused issue “Contemporary Issues and Controversies in Men’s Health” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Approach to fertility preservation in the male cancer patient with a new diagnosis of malignancy (adapted with permission from Halpern et al., “Guideline based approach to male fertility preservation”, Urologic Oncology 2019). PDE, phosphodiesterase; TESE, testicular sperm extraction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7-30. 10.3322/caac.21332 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Pescio MC, et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting. BMC Med 2016;14:1. 10.1186/s12916-015-0545-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johnson JA, Tough S, Sogc Genetics C. Delayed child-bearing. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:80-93. 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35138-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehmann V, Keim MC, Nahata L, et al. Fertility-related knowledge and reproductive goals in childhood cancer survivors: short communication. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2250-53. 10.1093/humrep/dex297 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartmann JT, Albrecht C, Schmoll HJ, et al. Long-term effects on sexual function and fertility after treatment of testicular cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;80:801-7. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690424 - DOI - PMC - PubMed