Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 17:10:320.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00320. eCollection 2020.

Different Effects of Pre-transplantation Measurable Residual Disease on Outcomes According to Transplant Modality in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive ALL

Affiliations

Different Effects of Pre-transplantation Measurable Residual Disease on Outcomes According to Transplant Modality in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome Positive ALL

Si-Qi Li et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: This study compared the effects of pre-transplantation measurable residual disease (pre-MRD) on outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL patients who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) or who received unmanipulated haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT). Methods: A retrospective study (n = 202) was performed. MRD was detected by RT-PCR and multiparameter flow cytometry. Results: In the total patient group, patients with positive pre-MRD had a higher 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than that in patients with negative pre-MRD (26.1% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.009); however, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) (7.4% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.148), probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (66.3% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.480), and overall survival (OS) (68.8% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.322) were comparable. In the MSDT group, patients with positive pre-MRD had increased 4-year CIR (56.4% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.001) and decreased 4-year LFS (35.9% vs. 71.0%, P = 0.024) and OS (35.9% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.011) compared with those with negative pre-MRD. In haplo-SCT settings, the 4-year CIR (14.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.297), NRM (7.3% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.187) and the 4-year probability of OS (77.7% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.804) and LFS (80.5% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.660) were comparable between pre-MRD positive and negative groups. In subgroup patients with positive pre-MRD, haplo-SCT had a lower 4-year CIR (14.8% vs. 56.4%, P = 0.021) and a higher 4-year LFS (77.7% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.036) and OS (80.5% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.027) than those of MSDT. Multivariate analysis showed that haplo-SCT was associated with lower CIR (HR, 0.288; P = 0.031), superior LFS (HR, 0.283; P = 0.019) and OS (HR, 0.252; P = 0.013) in cases with a positive pre-MRD subgroup. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the effects of positive pre-MRD on the outcomes of patients with Ph-positive ALL are different according to transplant modality. For Ph-positive cases with positive pre-MRD, haplo-SCT might have strong graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effects.

Keywords: HLA-matched sibling donor transplantation; Philadelphia-chromosome positive; acute lymphoblastic leukemia; haploidentical allografts; measurable residual disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between pre-transplantation MRD and transplant outcomes for Ph-positive ALL patients who underwent allo-SCT (n = 202). Kaplan–Meier estimates of (A) cumulative incidence of relapse mortality, (B) cumulative incidence of non-relapse, (C) leukemia-free survival, and (D) overall survival.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between pre-transplantation MRD and transplant outcomes for Ph-positive ALL patients who underwent MSDT (n = 61). Kaplan–Meier estimates of (A) cumulative incidence of relapse mortality, (B) cumulative incidence of non-relapse, (C) leukemia-free survival, and (D) overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between transplant modality and transplant outcomes for Ph-positive ALL patients with pre-transplantation MRD who underwent allo-SCT (n = 54). Kaplan–Meier estimates of (A) cumulative incidence of relapse mortality, (B) cumulative incidence of non-relapse, (C) leukemia-free survival, and (D) overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arico M, Valsecchi MG, Camitta B, Schrappe M, Chessells J, Baruchel A, et al. . Outcome of treatment in children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. New Eng J Med. (2000) 342:998–1006. 10.1056/NEJM200004063421402 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eckert C, Henze G, Seeger K, Hagedorn N, Mann G, Panzer-Grumayer R, et al. . Use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation based on minimal residual disease response improves outcomes for children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the intermediate-risk group. J Clin Oncol Offi J Am Soc Clin Oncol. (2013) 31:2736–42. 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.5680 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee KH, Lee JH, Choi SJ, Lee JH, Seol M, Lee YS, et al. . Clinical effect of imatinib added to intensive combination chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. (2005) 19:1509–16. 10.1038/sj.leu.2403886 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rousselot P, Coude MM, Gokbuget N, Gambacorti Passerini C, Hayette S, Cayuela JM, et al. . Dasatinib and low-intensity chemotherapy in elderly patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive all. Blood. (2016) 128:774–82. 10.1182/blood-2016-02-700153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daver N, Thomas D, Ravandi F, Cortes J, Garris R, Jabbour E, et al. . Final report of a phase II study of imatinib mesylate with hyper-CVAD for the front-line treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. (2015) 100:653–61. 10.3324/haematol.2014.118588 - DOI - PMC - PubMed