Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;6(2):138-144.
doi: 10.1159/000502699. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac: Clinical-Pathologic Analysis, Including Molecular Genetics

Affiliations

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Lacrimal Sac: Clinical-Pathologic Analysis, Including Molecular Genetics

Kalla A Gervasio et al. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess whether mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac is a counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 gene fusion-related salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

Methods: In this retrospective observational case series, pathology records were searched for all cases of lacrimal sac mucoepidermoid carcinoma diagnosed between 1990 and 2018. Data collected included demographics, clinical findings, management, and follow-up. Pathologic parameters assessed included tumor morphology, immunohistochemistry, and MAML2 and EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies.

Results: Six patients with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac, 5 males and 1 female, with a median age of 63 years (range 24-66) were identified. Five tumors were managed with radical resection and 1 patient underwent orbital exenteration. None of the patients developed recurrence or metastases with an average follow-up of 18 months (range 13-23). All tumors had morphologic and immunohistochemical features of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and overexpressed EGFR. MAML2 FISH was negative for MAML2 rearrangement in all tumors. EGFR FISH demonstrated EGFR amplification in 1 tumor.

Conclusions: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac is not a lacrimal sac counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 gene fusion-related salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma. EGFR pathway activation and EGFR amplification in a subset of these neoplasms suggest the potential role for anti-EGFR agents.

Keywords: Adenosquamous carcinoma; CRTC1/3-MAML2; EGFR; Lacrimal sac carcinoma; Lacrimal sac mucoepidermoid carcinoma; MAML2; Mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. None of the authors have relevant financial relationships with commercial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lacrimal sac tumor in patient 3. a Right medial canthal mass, focally situated above the medial canthal tendon (arrow). b Axial post-contrast computed tomography scan demonstrates a mass in the region of the lacrimal sac (arrow), with focal adjacent bony changes and with extension into the medial orbit. c Well-differentiated mucoepidermoid carcinoma is composed of epidermoid cells with intercellular bridges (arrow), mucocytes (arrowheads), and cells with intermediate morphology without appreciable nuclear atypia or mitotic activity, forming mucin-filled cysts (stain, hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification, ×100). dEGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization studies demonstrate amplification of red EGFR signal (arrowheads), which is 2–4 times the size of the green centromeric (Con 7) signal in neoplastic cell nuclei, compatible with an EGFR/Con 7 ratio of >2. In contrast, the cell nucleus without EGFR amplification features EGFR and centromeric signals of similar size (arrow).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Clinical and pathologic characteristics of lacrimal sac tumor in patient 5. a Right medial canthal mass (arrow). b Axial post-contrast computed tomography scan demonstrates a mass in the region of the lacrimal sac (arrow), with focal bone destruction and with extension into the medial orbit. c Invasive neoplasm, composed predominantly of nonkeratinizing epidermoid cells and intermediate cells, without readily identifiable mucocytes forms solid nests and cysts in a background of markedly desmoplastic stroma. d Alcian blue highlights the intracytoplasmic mucin in mucocytes (arrow). e Intense membranous staining with EGFR (arrow) is present in most neoplastic cells. (stains: a, hematoxylin-eosin; b, Alcian blue; c, EGFR; a–d, original magnification, ×50).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stefanyszyn MA, Hidayat AA, Pe'er JJ, Flanagan JC. Lacrimal sac tumors. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Sep;10((3)):169–84. - PubMed
    1. Fliss DM, Freeman JL, Hurwitz JJ, Heathcote JG. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac: a report of two cases, with observations on the histogenesis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993 Aug;28((5)):228–35. - PubMed
    1. Lee SB, Kim KN, Lee SR, Bernardino CR. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac after dacryocystectomy for squamous papilloma. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar-Apr;27((2)):e44–6. - PubMed
    1. Brar ST, Meyer D. Diagnosis and management of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal duct. Orbit. 2011 Jan;30((1)):34–6. - PubMed
    1. Yuksel D, Kosker M, Saribas F, Simsek S. Surgical treatment of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the lacrimal sac. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;29((2)):70–2. - PubMed