Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 16:2020:1726309.
doi: 10.1155/2020/1726309. eCollection 2020.

Molecular Aspects of Colorectal Adenomas: The Interplay among Microenvironment, Oxidative Stress, and Predisposition

Affiliations
Review

Molecular Aspects of Colorectal Adenomas: The Interplay among Microenvironment, Oxidative Stress, and Predisposition

Gitana Maria Aceto et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

The development of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a multistep process initiated by a benign polyp that has the potential to evolve into in situ carcinoma through the interactions between environmental and genetic factors. CRC incidence rates are constantly increased for young adult patients presenting an advanced tumor stage. The majority of CRCs arise from colonic adenomas originating from aberrant cell proliferation of colon epithelium. Endoscopic polypectomy represents a tool for early detection and removal of polyps, although the occurrence of cancers after negative colonoscopy shows a significant incidence. It has long been recognized that the aberrant regulation of Wingless/It (Wnt)/β-Catenin signaling in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer is supported by its critical role in the differentiation of stem cells in intestinal crypts and in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. For this review, we will focus on the development of adenomatous polyps through the interplay between renewal signaling in the colon epithelium and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The current knowledge of molecular pathology allows us to deepen the relationships between oxidative stress and other risk factors as lifestyle, microbiota, and predisposition. We underline that the chronic inflammation and ROS production in the colon epithelium can impair the Wnt/β-catenin and/or base excision repair (BER) pathways and predispose to polyp development. In fact, the coexistence of oxidative DNA damage and errors in DNA polymerase can foster C>T transitions in various types of cancer and adenomas, leading to a hypermutated phenotype of tumor cells. Moreover, the function of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) protein in regulating DNA repair is very important as therapeutic implication making DNA damaging chemotherapeutic agents more effective in CRC cells that tend to accumulate mutations. Additional studies will determine whether approaches based on Wnt inhibition would provide long-term therapeutic value in CRC, but it is clear that APC disruption plays a central role in driving and maintaining tumorigenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothetical model of interaction between APC and oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. The figure shows a hypothetical model of inactivation of the APC gene that takes into account the influence of oxidative stress. In this model, the known “three-hit hypothesis” is further updated stating that mutant APC protein retains some functions. Thus, the third hit could affect the residual part of the gene with copy number gains or deletions. We now propose APC copy number gain in response to high levels of DNA damage caused by oxidative stress or by DNA-alkylating agents.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connell L. C., Mota J. M., Braghiroli M. I., Hoff P. M. The rising incidence of younger patients with colorectal cancer: questions about screening, biology, and treatment. Current Treatment Options in Oncology. 2017;18(4):p. 23. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0463-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haggar F. A., Preen D. B., Pereira G., Holman C. D., Einarsdottir K. Cancer incidence and mortality trends in Australian adolescents and young adults. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:1982–2007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonnington S. N., Rutter M. D. Surveillance of colonic polyps: are we getting it right? World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;22(6):1925–1934. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim N. H., Jung Y. S., Jeong W. S., et al. Miss rate of colorectal neoplastic polyps and risk factors for missed polyps in consecutive colonoscopies. Intestinal Research. 2017;15(3):411–418. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.411. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances