Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;8(4):E525-E533.
doi: 10.1055/a-1093-0877. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Current challenges and future needs of clinical and endoscopic training in gastroenterology: a European survey

Affiliations

Current challenges and future needs of clinical and endoscopic training in gastroenterology: a European survey

Marcello Maida et al. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Background and study aims A universal European training program in gastroenterology and hepatology is currently not available. The European Board of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (EBGH) has produced guidance regarding expected competencies for European gastroenterology trainees but it is unclear whether these have been incorporated in national curricula. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth assessment of training and research opportunities, professional activities and of socioeconomic aspects of gastroenterology training across Europe through a web-based 90-point questionnaire. Materials and methods Physicians in their last year or who had recently finished their training, from 16 European countries, were invited to answer the questionnaire. Results A total of 144 physicians answered the survey. A minimum number of procedures is required before completing training in nine of 16 countries (56 %). Overall, European trainees dedicate a median of 12 months (IQR 6-25) of their training period to endoscopy and a median of 3 months (IQR 0-6) to ultrasound. Training in interventional endoscopy was not always exhaustive, as about 50 % of participants performed fewer of several interventional procedures than was recommended by EBGH, most participants did not perform endoscopic hemostasis or endoscopic mucosal resection, and nearly a half of participants had no access to pancreatobiliary endoscopy training. Finally, up to 13 % of residents complete their training without the supervision of a mentor. Conclusion In this large European survey, deep gaps and considerable differences in several gastroenterology training activities were found both among and within 16 European countries. Homogenization of educational programs and training opportunities across Europe is therefore necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
European nations included in the survey: Italy, Portugal, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, Romania, Lithuania, Sweden, Greece, Poland, Russia and Serbia.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall time dedicated to training program ( a ), scientific research ( b ) and theoretical lessons ( c ).

References

    1. Anderson P, Dalziel K, Davies E et al. Survey of digestive health across Europe: Final report. Part 2: The economic impact and burden of digestive disorders. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014;2:544–546. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Blue book of GastroenterologyAvailable from:http://www.eubogh.org/blue-book/
    1. Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A. Gastroenterology training in Europe: unmet educational needs beyond the machines. Gut. 2016;65:185–187. - PubMed
    1. European Specialty Examination in Gastroenterology & Hepatology Available from:https://www.mrcpuk.org/mrcpuk-examinations/euro-specialty-examinations/e...
    1. Bisschops R, Wilmer A, Tack J. A survey on gastroenterology training in Europe. Gut. 2002;50:724–729. - PMC - PubMed