Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 25;7(2):140-145.
doi: 10.14744/nci.2019.59751. eCollection 2020.

Current situation analysis of diabetic home care patients

Affiliations

Current situation analysis of diabetic home care patients

Meltem Sertbas et al. North Clin Istanb. .

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes is one of the primary diagnoses for admission to home health care units. Although there are many studies about elderly diabetic patients, there are not many studies on home care patients with diabetes. The present study aims to analyze the current status of diabetic home care patients with their biochemical data and medications.

Methods: This was a retrospective study, including 256 diabetic patients who were following up by the Home Health Unit of Istanbul Provincial Health Directorate Public Hospitals Services-2. In this study, we analyzed the current biochemical data of the patients with their medications.

Results: In this study, 185 female (72.3%) and 71 male (27.7%) patients were recruited with the mean HbA1c of 8.25±1.77. Among these patients, 65% of them were using oral antidiabetic (OAD), and 58% were using insulin. There were 21 (8.2%) patients who were not receiving any treatment. While patients who were using only oral antidiabetic have better A1c levels (A1c: 7.73±1.45), patients who were insülin using had HbA1c levels as high as the patients who were not using any medication. This may be due to the progression of diabetes, fear of hypoglycemia or insufficient insülin use. While metformin was the most commonly used OAD, with a 38% usage rate. When compared to HbA1c levels, there was no difference between the types of insulin used (p=0.167).

Conclusion: As a result, it is important to plan regular visits and personalized treatment by keeping in mind the benefits to risk ratios in home-care diabetic patients.

Keywords: Antidiabetics; diabetes mellitus; home care services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ünal B, Ergör G, Horasan GD, Kalaça S, Sözmen K. Türkiye kronik hastalıklar ve risk faktörleri sıklığıçalışması. Sağlık BakanlığıYayın No:909. [Accessed Mar 17 2020]. Available at: https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/khrfat.pdf .
    1. Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. An Empirical Study of Chronic Diseases in the United States:A Visual Analytics Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:431. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaul E, Barron J. Age-Related Diseases and Clinical and Public Health Implications for the 85?Years Old and Over Population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Umpierrez GE, Pasquel FJ. Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Diabetes in Older Adults. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:509–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association 11 Older Adults:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;4:S119–25. - PubMed