Comparison of the Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Midazolam-Ketamine and Propofol-Sufentanil Combinations in Painful Procedures of Children with Haematologic Malignancy
- PMID: 32259143
- PMCID: PMC7101195
- DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.42402
Comparison of the Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Midazolam-Ketamine and Propofol-Sufentanil Combinations in Painful Procedures of Children with Haematologic Malignancy
Abstract
Objective: Bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture play essential roles in the diagnosis and treatment of haematological disorders. These repeated invasive procedures lead to considerable pain and stress in children, which is emotionally stressful for their parents. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of two combinations of midazolam-ketamine (MK) and propofol-sufentanil (PS) in painful procedures of children with haematologic malignancy.
Methods: In this prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial, we enrolled 80 eligible patients with haematologic malignancy aged 2-14 years. We randomly allocated them to the MK and PS groups. We recorded and compared the level of sedation, pain severity, hemodynamic indices, the onset of effect, duration of recovery and complications during and after procedure in the two groups. We analysed the data using the SPSS software. We used Mann-Whitney U, independent t-test, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare continuous and categorical variables.
Results: From initially enrolled patients, 68 patients completed the study (38 in PS and 30 in MK group). The levels of sedation and the mean score of pain intensity were significantly lower in the MK group than those in the PS group (p<0.05). Movements and the needs to repeat the dose were significantly lower in the MK group than those in the PS group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: During bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture procedures in children with haematologic malignancy, the findings of this trial suggest that MK combination therapy provides better sedation and analgesia than PS.
Keywords: Haematologic malignancy; ketamine; midazolam; propofol; sufentanil.
© Copyright 2020 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Yamamoto S, Akiyama K, Hayashi M, Toyama D, Isoyama K. Efficacy and Safety of Slowly Infused Propofol Sedation in Pediatric Oncology Procedures. J Gen Practice. 2015;4:1–4. doi: 10.4172/2329-9126.1000202. - DOI
-
- Bhatnagar S, Mishra S, Gupta M, Srikanti M, Mondol A, Diwedi A. Efficacy and safety of a mixture of Ketamine, midazolam and atropine for procedural sedation in paediatric oncology: a randomised study of oral versus intramuscular route. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:201–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01233.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Khutia SK, Mandal MC, Das S, Basu SR. Intravenous infusion of Ketamine-propofol can be an alternative to intravenous infusion of fentanyl-propofol for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing emergency short surgical procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56:145–50. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.96313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources