A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings
- PMID: 32259184
- PMCID: PMC12275750
- DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2019.41
A Novel Tool for the Early Identification of Frailty in Elderly People: The Application in Primary Care Settings
Abstract
Background: Frailty is a pre-disability condition in older persons providing a challenge to Health-Care Systems. Systematic reviews highlight the absence of a gold-standard for its identification. However, an approach based on initial screening by the General Practitioner (GP) seems particularly useful. On these premises, a 9-item Sunfrail Checklist (SC), was developed by a multidisciplinary group, in the context of European Sunfrail Project, and tested in the Community.
Objectives: - to measure the concordance between the judgments of frailty (criterion-validity): the one formulated by the GP, using the SC, and the one subsequently expressed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Team (CGA-Team); - to determine the construct-validity through the correspondence between some checklist items related to the 3 domains (physical, cognitive and social) and the three tools used by the CGA-Team; - to measure the instrument's performance in terms of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).
Design: Cross-sectional study, with a final sample-size of 95 subjects.
Setting: Two Community-Health Centers of Parma, Italy.
Participants: Subjects aged 75 years old or more, with no disability and living in the community.
Measurements: We compared the screening capacity of the GP using the SC to that one of CGA-Team based on three tests: 4-meter Gait-Speed, Mini-Mental State Examination and Loneliness Scale.
Results: 95 subjects (51 women), with a mean age of 81±4 years were enrolled. According to GPs 34 subjects were frail; the CGA-Team expressed a frailty judgment on 26 subjects. The criterion-validity presented a Cohen's k of 0.353. Construct-validity was also low, with a maximum contingency-coefficient of 0.19. The analysis showed a PPV of 58.1% and a NPV equal to 84.6%.
Conclusions: Our data showed a low agreement between the judgements of GP performed by SC and CGA-Team. However, the good NPV suggests the applicability of SC for screening activities in primary-care.
Keywords: Ageing; frailty; integrated care; multimorbidity; sunfrail.
Conflict of interest statement
All the authors have nothing to disclose
Figures
References
-
- Sacha J, Sacha M, Soboń J, Borysiuk Z, Feusette P. Is It Time to Begin a Public Campaign Concerning Frailty and Pre-frailty? A Review Article. Front Physiol. 2017;8:484. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00484 Jul. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Schols JM. Testing an integral conceptual model of frailty. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(9):2047–2060. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05896.x Sep. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sutorius FL, Hoogendijk EO, Prins BA, van Hout HP. Comparison of 10 single and stepped methods to identify frail older persons in primary care: diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:102. 10.1186/s12875-016-0487-y Aug. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cesari M, Prince M, Thiyagarajan JA, et al. Frailty: An Emerging Public Health Priority. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(3):188–192. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.016 Mar. - DOI - PubMed
-
- van Kempen JA, Schers HJ, Jacobs A, et al. Development of an instrument for the identification of frail older people as a target population for integrated care. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(608):e225–e231. 10.3399/bjgp13X664289 Mar. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
