Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Jul 7;173(1):21-28.
doi: 10.7326/M20-1260. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Locally Informed Simulation to Predict Hospital Capacity Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Locally Informed Simulation to Predict Hospital Capacity Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Gary E Weissman et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic challenges hospital leaders to make time-sensitive, critical decisions about clinical operations and resource allocations.

Objective: To estimate the timing of surges in clinical demand and the best- and worst-case scenarios of local COVID-19-induced strain on hospital capacity, and thus inform clinical operations and staffing demands and identify when hospital capacity would be saturated.

Design: Monte Carlo simulation instantiation of a susceptible, infected, removed (SIR) model with a 1-day cycle.

Setting: 3 hospitals in an academic health system.

Patients: All people living in the greater Philadelphia region.

Measurements: The COVID-19 Hospital Impact Model (CHIME) (http://penn-chime.phl.io) SIR model was used to estimate the time from 23 March 2020 until hospital capacity would probably be exceeded, and the intensity of the surge, including for intensive care unit (ICU) beds and ventilators.

Results: Using patients with COVID-19 alone, CHIME estimated that it would be 31 to 53 days before demand exceeds existing hospital capacity. In best- and worst-case scenarios of surges in the number of patients with COVID-19, the needed total capacity for hospital beds would reach 3131 to 12 650 across the 3 hospitals, including 338 to 1608 ICU beds and 118 to 599 ventilators.

Limitations: Model parameters were taken directly or derived from published data across heterogeneous populations and practice environments and from the health system's historical data. CHIME does not incorporate more transition states to model infection severity, social networks to model transmission dynamics, or geographic information to account for spatial patterns of human interaction.

Conclusion: Publicly available and designed for hospital operations leaders, this modeling tool can inform preparations for capacity strain during the early days of a pandemic.

Primary funding source: University of Pennsylvania Health System and the Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center.

Keywords: COVID-19; Forecasting; Immune system; Intensive care units; Population statistics; Prevention, policy, and public health; Pulmonary diseases; Sensitivity; Upper respiratory tract infections; Ventilators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Projected daily total hospital census (top), intensive care unit ICU census (middle), and patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (bottom) for patients with COVID-19. Shaded regions represent 2.5% and 97.5% percentiles across 1000 simulations representing upper and lower bounds on likely scenarios. The gray horizontal lines indicate current health system capacity. ICU = intensive care unit.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Results of sensitivity analysis. A range of epidemic scenarios based on incident doubling time from worst (2 days) to best (10 days), with a base case of 6 days plotted against current hospital resources, are shown. The green subaxis represents the probability of exceeding current capacity.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Peak simultaneous demand for ventilators depending on the epidemic doubling time and the percentage of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Comment in

References

    1. Halpern SD. ICU capacity strain and the quality and allocation of critical care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011;17:648-57. [PMID: 21986461] doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e32834c7a53. - PubMed
    1. Brown SE, Rey MM, Pardo D, et al. The allocation of intensivists' rounding time under conditions of intensive care unit capacity strain [Letter]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:831-4. [PMID: 25271748] doi:10.1164/rccm.201406-1127LE. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hua M, Halpern SD, Gabler NB, et al. Effect of ICU strain on timing of limitations in life-sustaining therapy and on death. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:987-94. [PMID: 26862018] doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4240-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gabler NB, Ratcliffe SJ, Wagner J, et al. Mortality among patients admitted to strained intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:800-6. [PMID: 23992449] doi:10.1164/rccm.201304-0622OC. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner J, Gabler NB, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. Outcomes among patients discharged from busy intensive care units. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:447-55. [PMID: 24081285] doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-7-201310010-00004. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types