Ultra-low depth sequencing of plasma cell DNA for the detection of copy number aberrations in multiple myeloma
- PMID: 32259320
- DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22848
Ultra-low depth sequencing of plasma cell DNA for the detection of copy number aberrations in multiple myeloma
Abstract
Cytogenetic abnormalities are powerful prognostic factors in multiple myeloma (MM) and are routinely analyzed by FISH on bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC). Although considered the gold standard, FISH experiments can be laborious and expensive. Therefore, array-CGH (aCGH) has been introduced as an alternative approach for detecting copy number aberrations (CNA), reducing the number of FISH experiments per case and yielding genome-wide information. Currently, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies offer new perspectives for the diagnostic workup of malignant disorders. In this study, we examined ultra-low depth whole genome sequencing (LDS) as a valid alternative for aCGH for the detection of CNA in BM PC in MM. To this end, BM aspirates obtained in a diagnostic setting from 20 MM cases were analyzed. CD138+ cell-sorted samples were subjected to FISH analysis. DNA was extracted for subsequent aCGH and LDS analysis. CNA were detected by aCGH and LDS in all but one case. Importantly, all CNA identified by parallel first generation aCGH analysis were also detected by LDS, along with six additional CNA in five cases. One of these additional aberrations was in a region of prognostic importance in MM and was confirmed using FISH. However, risk stratification in these particular cases was unaffected. Thus, a perfectly concordant prognostication between array-CGH and LDS was observed. This validates LDS as a novel and cost-efficient tool for the detection of CNA in MM.
Keywords: molecular cytogenetics; multiple myeloma; prognostic factor; ultra-low depth sequencing.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Ultra-low coverage whole genome sequencing of ccfDNA in multiple myeloma: A tool for laboratory routine?Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;28:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100380. Epub 2021 Apr 25. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021. PMID: 33962213
-
Genomic profiling of myeloma: the best approach, a comparison of cytogenetics, FISH and array-CGH of 112 myeloma cases.J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jan;69(1):82-6. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203054. Epub 2015 Sep 3. J Clin Pathol. 2016. PMID: 26338801
-
Low-depth sequencing for copy number abnormalities in multiple myeloma supersedes fluorescent in situ hybridization in scope and resolution.Clin Genet. 2019 Aug;96(2):163-168. doi: 10.1111/cge.13561. Epub 2019 May 29. Clin Genet. 2019. PMID: 31066036
-
Assessing genome-wide copy number aberrations and copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity as best practice: An evidence-based review from the Cancer Genomics Consortium working group for plasma cell disorders.Cancer Genet. 2018 Dec;228-229:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Oct 5. Cancer Genet. 2018. PMID: 30393007 Review.
-
Genomic profiling of multiple myeloma: New insights and modern technologies.Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2020 Mar;33(1):101153. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2020.101153. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2020. PMID: 32139018 Review.
Cited by
-
Genome Instability in Multiple Myeloma: Facts and Factors.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 26;13(23):5949. doi: 10.3390/cancers13235949. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34885058 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International myeloma working group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-e548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.
-
- Sonneveld P, Lonial S, Usmani S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the international myeloma working group. Blood. 2017;127(24):2955-2963. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200.BLOOD.
-
- Caers J, Garderet L, Kortüm KM, et al. European myeloma network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when. Haematologica. 2018;103(11):1772-1784. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.189159.
-
- Manier S, Salem KZ, Park J, Landau DA, Getz G, Ghobrial IM. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(2):100-113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122.
-
- Fonseca R, Bergsagel PL, Drach J, et al. International myeloma working group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia. 2009;23(12):2210-2221. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.174.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical