Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 4;12(4):325.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040325.

Norfloxacin-Loaded Electrospun Scaffolds: Montmorillonite Nanocomposite vs. Free Drug

Affiliations

Norfloxacin-Loaded Electrospun Scaffolds: Montmorillonite Nanocomposite vs. Free Drug

Angela Faccendini et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Infections in nonhealing wounds remain one of the major challenges. Recently, nanomedicine approach seems a valid option to overcome the antibiotic resistance mechanisms. The aim of this study was the development of three types of polysaccharide-based scaffolds (chitosan-based (CH), chitosan/chondroitin sulfate-based (CH/CS), chitosan/hyaluronic acid-based (CH/HA)), as dermal substitutes, to be loaded with norfloxacin, intended for the treatment of infected wounds. The scaffolds have been loaded with norfloxacin as a free drug (N scaffolds) or in montmorillonite nanocomposite (H-hybrid-scaffolds). Chitosan/glycosaminoglycan (chondroitin sulfate or hyaluronic acid) scaffolds were prepared by means of electrospinning with a simple, one-step process. The scaffolds were characterized by 500 nm diameter fibers with homogeneous structures when norfloxacin was loaded as a free drug. On the contrary, the presence of nanocomposite caused a certain degree of surface roughness, with fibers having 1000 nm diameters. The presence of norfloxacin-montmorillonite nanocomposite (1%) caused higher deformability (90%-120%) and lower elasticity (5-10 mN/cm2), decreasing the mechanical resistance of the systems. All the scaffolds were proven to be degraded via lysozyme (this should ensure scaffold resorption) and this sustained the drug release (from 50% to 100% in 3 days, depending on system composition), especially when the drug was loaded in the scaffolds as a nanocomposite. Moreover, the scaffolds were able to decrease the bioburden at least 100-fold, proving that drug loading in the scaffolds did not impair the antimicrobial activity of norfloxacin. Chondroitin sulfate and montmorillonite in the scaffolds are proven to possess a synergic performance, enhancing the fibroblast proliferation without impairing norfloxacin's antimicrobial properties. The scaffold based on chondroitin sulfate, containing 1% norfloxacin in the nanocomposite, demonstrated adequate stiffness to sustain fibroblast proliferation and the capability to sustain antimicrobial properties to prevent/treat nonhealing wound infection during the healing process.

Keywords: antimicrobial properties; chitosan; electrospinning; fibroblasts proliferation; glycosaminoglycans; scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
UV spectra of N (red line) and N subjected to heat treatment (1 h at 150 °C) (black line) obtained from the HPLC analysis at N peak maximum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SEM microphotographs of chitosan-based (CH), chitosan/chondroitin sulfate-based (CH/CS) and chitosan/hyaluronic acid-based (CH/HA) scaffolds loaded with 1% or 2% norfloxacin, as a free drug (1% N or 2% N), or in VHS-N nanocomposite. In each image, the nanofiber diameters (nm, mean values ± SD; n = 30) and Si content for hybrid scaffolds are reported. Statistics: Mann–Whitney (Wilcoxon) W test p < 0.05: CH2H vs. CH/CS2H; CH/CS2H vs. CH/HA2H; CH/HA1H vs. CH/HA2H; CH/HA2H vs. CH/HA2N (scale bar 5 μm).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transmission electron microscope (TEM) microphotographs and EDX spectra for CH, CH/CS and CH/HA scaffolds loaded with 2% norfloxacin in nanocomposite CH (AC), CH/CS (GI) and CH/HA (DF).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra evaluated for norfloxacin-loaded scaffolds (CH-N2, CH/CS-N2, CH/HA-N2) and VHS-N loaded scaffolds (CH-H2, CH/CS-H2, CH/HA-H2), both types containing 2% w/w norfloxacin in norfloxacin–montmorillonite nanocomposite (VHS-N).
Figure 5
Figure 5
X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) diffractograms of the scaffolds loaded with VHS-N at 2% norfloxacin (CH-H2, CH/CS-H2, CH/HA-H2) compared to unloaded CH scaffolds (CH) and VHS-N.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mechanical properties (force at break mN, a-b; elongation %, c-d; Young’s modulus mN.cm2, e-f) for dry (a,c,e) and wet (b,d,f) scaffolds loaded with 1% (a) or 2% (b) of norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or as nanocomposite (H) (mean values ± SD; n = 3). Statistics: * = Mann–Whitney (Wilcoxon) W test p < 0.05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Release profiles (%) of norfloxacin from the N or H scaffolds loaded with 1% (a) or 2% (b) as a free drug (N) or as nanocomposite (H), in saline solution (mean values ± SD; n = 3).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Norfloxacin released (%) in lysozyme from the scaffolds loaded with 1% (a) or 2% (b) of norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or as nanocomposite (H) and glucosamine released (%) from the scaffolds loaded with 1% (c) or 2% (d) of norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or as nanocomposite (H) subjected to lysozyme activity (mean values ± SD; n = 3)
Figure 9
Figure 9
SEM microphotographs of the scaffolds loaded with 1% or 2% of norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or as nanocomposite (H) subjected to lysozyme activity for 10 days (scale bar: 5 µm).
Figure 10
Figure 10
Cytocompatibility (optical density (OD)) of fibroblasts grown for 3 days (a) and 6 days (b) onto CH (blue), CH/CS (red), CH/HA (green) loaded with norfloxacin at 1% (plain color) and 2% (oblique lines), and with norfloxacin–montmorillonite nanocomposite (N-VHS) at 1% (horizontal lines) and 2% (dots) in norfloxacin. N norfloxacin as a free drug and H (N-VHS nanocomposite) at the same concentrations of the scaffolds are evaluated (mean values ± SD; n = 8). Statistics: * = Mann–Whitney (Wilcoxon) W test p < 0.05.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) microphotographs of fibroblasts grown for 6 days onto CH, CH/CS, CH/HA loaded with norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or norfloxacin–montmorillonite nanocomposite (H, N-VHS) at 1% or 2% (in blue: nuclei; in green: cytoskeleton) (scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 12
Figure 12
SEM microphotographs of fibroblasts grown for 6 days onto CH, CH/CS, CH/HA loaded with norfloxacin as a free drug (N) or norfloxacin–montmorillonite nanocomposite (H, N-VHS) at 1% or 2% (scale bar: 50 μm).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Microbicidal effect evaluated for 1% norfloxacin as a free drug (a,c) and (b,d) as nanocomposite loaded into CH, CH/CS and CH/HA scaffolds against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (a and b) and Staphylococcus aureus (c and d), in comparison to norfloxacin as a free drug and as nanocomposite, with the same concentration as in the scaffolds (mean values ± SD; n = 3).

References

    1. Boateng J., Matthews K., Stevens H.N., Eccleston G.M. Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008;97:2892–2923. doi: 10.1002/jps.21210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Velnar T., Bailey T., Smrkolj V. The Wound Healing Process: An Overview of the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. J. Int. Med Res. 2009;37:1528–1542. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700531. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta A., Mumtaz S., Li C.-H., Hussain I., Rotello V.M. Combatting antibiotic-resistant bacteria using nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:415–427. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00748E. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siddiqui A.R., Bernstein J.M. Chronic wound infection: Facts and controversies. Clin. Dermatol. 2010;28:519–526. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Percival S. Importance of biofilm formation in surgical infection. BJS. 2017;104:e85–e94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10433. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources