Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;105(2):216-221.
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315933. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Visual acuity outcomes and anti-VEGF therapy intensity in diabetic macular oedema: a real-world analysis of 28 658 patient eyes

Affiliations

Visual acuity outcomes and anti-VEGF therapy intensity in diabetic macular oedema: a real-world analysis of 28 658 patient eyes

Thomas A Ciulla et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Background/aim: To assess visual acuity (VA) outcomes and antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment intensity in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in treatment-naïve patients with DMO from 2013 to 2018 using a database of aggregated de-identified electronic medical records (Vestrum Health).

Results: At 1 year, 28 658 patient eyes underwent a mean of 6.4 anti-VEGF injections, gaining a mean of +4.2 letters (95% confidence interval for mean gain: +4.0 to +4.5 letters, p<0.001). When stratified by anti-VEGF medication and by years 2013-2018, no clinically meaningful differences in injection frequency or 1-year VA change resulted. At 1 year, 50% of eyes received ≤6 injections, while <20% received 10-13 injections, representing monthly treatment. Mean letters gained at 1 year generally showed a linear relationship with mean number of anti-VEGF injections, beyond two injections. Eyes with good baseline VA (≥20/40) generally were at risk of VA loss at 1 year; those with moderately severe baseline impairment (20/70 to 20/200) who received ≥10 injections improved by a mean of +10.3 letters.

Conclusion: In clinical practice, patients with DMO undergo fewer anti-VEGF injections and exhibit worse visual gains compared with patients in randomised clinical trials. Visual outcomes correlate with treatment intensity at 1 year, with ceiling effects related to baseline VA.

Keywords: macula; retina; treatment medical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JFP and DFW are co-founders of Vestrum Health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Histogram showing the distribution of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) patient eyes stratified by number of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections received in the first year of treatment. The median number of injections/eye in the first year of treatment was 6. The distribution is skewed towards the lower range, with 50% of patient eyes receiving ≤6 injections and <20% of patient eyes receiving 10–13 injections, representing monthly treatment. (B) Graph showing change in visual acuity (VA) versus anti-VEGF injections administered to all DMO patient eyes in the first year of treatment. The 95% CIs are included. At 1 year, mean letters gained showed a linear relationship with number of anti-VEGF injections, beyond 2 injections. (C) Graph showing the mean VA change over 1 year, stratified by both anti-VEGF injection frequency and baseline VA. Mean 1-year VA change tended to increase in patient eyes with both increased anti-VEGF injection frequency and decreased baseline VA. There were ceiling effects related to baseline VA. Patient eyes with baseline VA of 20/40 or better generally were at risk of VA loss at 1 year, except for those who received ≥10 injections. However, these patient eyes also showed better final VA compared with those starting with worse baseline VA.

References

    1. Ciulla TA, Amador AG, Zinman B. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2653–64. 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stone T. Preferences and trends membership survey. 2018 Chicago, IL: American Society of Retina Specialists, 2018.
    1. Korobelnik J-F, Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. . Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2247–54. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, et al. . Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: rise and ride. Ophthalmology 2012;119:789–801. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Wells JA, Glassman AR, et al. . Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1193–203. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms