Systematic review of gender differences in the epidemiology and risk factors of exertional heat illness and heat tolerance in the armed forces

Abstract

Objectives: This review aimed to describe the epidemiology of all heat-related illnesses in women compared with men in the armed forces and to identify gender-specific risk factors and differences in heat tolerance.

Design: A systematic review of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Emcare, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Informit and Scopus) was conducted from the inception of the databases to 1 April 2019 using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines.

Eligibility criteria: All relevant studies investigating and comparing heat illness and heat tolerance in women and men in the armed forces were included in the review.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included in the systematic review. The incidence of heat stroke in women ranged from 0.10 to 0.26 per 1000 person-years, while the incidence of heat stroke ranged from 0.22 to 0.48 per 1000 person-years in men. The incidence of other heat illnesses in women compared with men ranged from 1.30 to 2.89 per 1000 person-years versus 0.98 to 1.98 per 1000 person-years. The limited evidence suggests that women had a greater risk of exertional heat illness compared with men. Other gender-specific risk factors were slower run times and body mass index. Although there was a higher proportion of women who were heat intolerant compared with men, this finding needs to be interpreted with caution due to the limited evidence.

Conclusion: The findings of this review suggest that men experienced a slightly higher incidence of heat stroke than women in the armed forces. In addition, the limited available evidence suggests that a higher proportion of women were heat intolerant and being a female was associated with a greater risk of exertional heat illnesses. Given the limited evidence available, further research is required to investigate the influence of gender differences on heat intolerance and heat illness.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; armed forces; heat stroke; occupational & industrial medicine; women.

Figure 1

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis flow chart of the study selection protocol.

Figure 2

The incidence rate of exertional heat stroke between men and women in the armed forces from 2006 to 2018.

Figure 3

Incidence rate of other heat illnesses (including heat exhaustion and unspecified effects of heat and light) between men and women in the armed forces from 2006 to 2018.