Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;146(7):1877-1881.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03196-9. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

Unilateral versus bilateral lymph-nodal metastases and oncologic outcome in vulvar cancer patients

Affiliations

Unilateral versus bilateral lymph-nodal metastases and oncologic outcome in vulvar cancer patients

Andrea Papadia et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the difference in oncologic outcome between vulvar cancer patients with uni- and bilateral inguino-femoral lymph nodal involvement and to identify factors affecting their oncologic outcome MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer were classified into three groups according to their lymph nodal status at the histology analysis (negative, positive one side, positive bilaterally). PFS and OS survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze factors predicting overall survival and progression-free survival. Multivariable models were used for variables reporting a p value ≤ 0.1 at the univariate analysis. p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: One hundred and forty-six patients were considered for the analysis. Patients with bilaterally negative lymph nodes had significantly longer PFS and OS as compared to patients with unilateral and bilateral involvement. Patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement had better PFS than patients with bilateral lymph nodal involvement. Among these patients, the difference in the OS approached but did not reach statistical significance. At the multivariate analysis, the tumor size affected PFS and lymph nodal involvement affected OS.

Conclusion: Vulvar cancer patients with bilateral positive lymph nodes have worse oncologic outcome as compared to patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement; similarly, patients with unilateral lymph nodal involvement have worse oncological outcome as compared to patients with bilateral negative lymph nodes. Furthermore, tumor size and lymph nodal status are independent factors predicting recurrence rate and overall survival, respectively.

Keywords: Lymph node metastases; Overall survival; Progression-free survival; Vulvar cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Nothing to declare.

References

    1. Alkatout I, Schubert M, Garbrecht N et al (2015) Vulvar cancer: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management options. Int J Women’s Health 7:305–313 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aragona AM, Cuneo NA, Soderini AH, Alcoba EB (2014) An analysis of reported independent prognostic factors for survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: is tumor size significance being underrated? Gynecol Oncol 132:643–648 - PubMed
    1. Ayhan A, Velipasaoglu M, Salman MC, Guven S, Gultekin M et al (2008) Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in primary vulvar squamous cell cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:1143–1149 - PubMed
    1. Baiocchi G, Silva Cestari FM, Rocha RM, Lavorato-Rocha A, Maia BM, Cestari LA et al (2013) Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:780–785 - PubMed
    1. Bogani G, Cromi A, Serati M, Uccella S, Donato VD et al (2017) Predictors and patterns of local, regional, and distant failure in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Clin Oncol 40:235–240 - PubMed