Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction
- PMID: 32267059
- PMCID: PMC7687244
- DOI: 10.1111/resp.13816
Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction
Abstract
Background and objective: The RENEW trial demonstrated that bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils improves quality of life, pulmonary function and exercise performance. In this post hoc analysis of RENEW, we examine the mechanism of action of endobronchial coils that drives improvement in clinical outcomes.
Methods: A total of 78 patients from the RENEW coil-treated group who were treated in one or both lobes that were deemed as the most destroyed were included in this retrospective analysis. Expiratory and inspiratory HRCT scans were used to assess lobar volume change from baseline to 12 months post coil treatment in treated and untreated lobes.
Results: Reduction in lobar RV in treated lobes was significantly associated with favourable clinical improvement. Independent predictor of the change in RV and FEV1 was the change in lobar RV reduction in the treated lobes and for change in 6MWD the absence of cardiac disease and the change in SGRQ, while the independent predictor of change in SGRQ was the change in 6MWD.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that residual lobar volume reduction in treated lobes measured by QCT is the driving mechanism of action of endobronchial coils leading to positive clinical outcomes. However, the improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life seems to be affected by the presence of cardiac disease.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01608490.
Keywords: bronchoscopy and interventional techniques; emphysema; endobronchial coils; lung volume reduction; quantitative computed tomographic analysis.
© 2020 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
Figures
, Responders without compensatory expansion;
, responders with compensatory expansion;
, non‐responders (no change in lobar RV). CT, computed tomography; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity.
Comment in
-
Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Do they work and why?Respirology. 2020 Nov;25(11):1116-1118. doi: 10.1111/resp.13895. Epub 2020 Jul 12. Respirology. 2020. PMID: 32657008 No abstract available.
References
-
- van Geffen WH, Slebos DJ, Herth FJ, Kemp SV, Weder W, Shah PL. Surgical and endoscopic interventions that reduce lung volume for emphysema: a systemic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019; 7: 313–24. - PubMed
-
- Palamidas AF, Kemp SV, Shen M, McNulty W, Zoumot Z, Hopkinson NS, Yang GZ, Shah PL. Putative mechanisms of action of endobronchial coils. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017; 196: 109–15. - PubMed
-
- Klooster K, Ten Hacken NH, Franz I, Kerstjens HA, van Rikxoort EM, Slebos DJ. Lung volume reduction coil treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with homogeneous emphysema: a prospective feasibility trial. Respiration 2014; 88: 116–25. - PubMed
-
- Makris D, Leroy S, Pradelli J, Benzaquen J, Guenard H, Perotin JM, Zakynthinos E, Deslee G, Marquette CH. Changes in dynamic lung mechanics after lung volume reduction coil treatment of severe emphysema. Thorax 2018; 73: 584–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
