Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Apr 6;12(4):1009.
doi: 10.3390/nu12041009.

Food Sources and Nutrient Intakes of Filipino Working Adults

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Food Sources and Nutrient Intakes of Filipino Working Adults

Imelda Angeles-Agdeppa et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Nutrition is an integral part of economic development, since it influences workers' healthand productivity. This study evaluated the usual nutrient intakes and food sources of workingadults. We conducted a cross-sectional survey that involved 1264 selected working adults aged 19to 59 years old from randomly selected job sectors. Quantitative dietary data was collected by a 2-day, non-consecutive 24 h recall, while a dietary diversity questionnaire was used to assess the typesand frequency of foods consumed. Physical activity was measured using the World HealthOrganization global physical assessment questionnaire. The prevalence of inadequate intakes,defined as the percentage of adults with intakes less than the estimated average requirements (EAR)or acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges (AMDR) were estimated using the PC-Softwarefor Intake Distribution Estimation (PC-SIDE) program. The mean daily energy intake of workingadults was 1768 kcal/day or 74% of the Estimated Energy Requirements (EER) for this age group.The percentage contribution to the total energy of fats (58%) and proteins (34%) were excessivelyhigh. Consumption of fruits and vegetables was only 30% and 40% of the recommended nutrientintake, respectively. Salt intake was 52% above the adequate intake. Nutrient inadequacy was highin almost all nutrients, including iron (99%), folate (97.9%), riboflavin (95.8%), calcium (94.7%),vitamin C (87.3%), and thiamin (76.6%). The top five food sources of energy included rice (35.6%),pork (15.1%), fats and oils (4.7%), chicken (4.4%), and bread (3.8%). Energy and nutrient intakes ofworking adults is extremely sub-optimal due to the consumption of few nutrient-dense foods. Thismay pose a triple burden of malnutrition if left unsolved.

Keywords: working adults, usual energy intake, nutrient intake, food sources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The design, data collection, analysis and write-up of research study are solely done by the Authors. The funds were provided by Nestle Philippines, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of participants consuming each food group based on a 24 h recall.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage contributions of each food groups to the total energy, carbohydrate, protein, and total fat intake.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage contributions of each food group to the vitamin intake of Filipino working adults.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage contributions of each food group to the calcium and iron intake of Filipino working adults.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Percentage distribution of the respondents’ physical activity by sector.

References

    1. World Health Organization Constitution of the World Health Organization. [(accessed on 14 September 2019)];WHO is South-East Asia. 1947 Available online: http://www.searo.who.int/about/constitution/en/
    1. Shearer J., Graham T.E., Skinner T.L. Nutra-ergonomics: Influence of nutrition on physical employment standards and the health of workers. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016;41:S165–S174. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0531. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Bank Group The World Bank and Nutrition. [(accessed on 14 September 2019)];2019 Apr 1; Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/nutrition/overview.
    1. GDB 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2015;388:1659–1724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloom D., Cafiero E., Abrahams-Gessel S., Bloom L.R., Fathima S., Feigl A.B. The Global Economic Burden of Non-communicable Diseases. World Economic Forum; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011.

Publication types