Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery
- PMID: 32269329
- DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0290-z
Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery
Erratum in
-
Publisher Correction: Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;18(8):589. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00469-7. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34035501 No abstract available.
Abstract
The global numbers of robotic gastrointestinal surgeries are increasing. However, the evidence base for robotic gastrointestinal surgery does not yet support its widespread adoption or justify its cost. The reasons for its continued popularity are complex, but a notable driver is the push for innovation - robotic surgery is seen as a compelling solution for delivering on the promise of minimally invasive precision surgery - and a changing commercial landscape delivers the promise of increased affordability. Novel systems will leverage the robot as a data-driven platform, integrating advances in imaging, artificial intelligence and machine learning for decision support. However, if this vision is to be realized, lessons must be heeded from current clinical trials and translational strategies, which have failed to demonstrate patient benefit. In this Perspective, we critically appraise current research to define the principles on which the next generation of gastrointestinal robotics trials should be based. We also discuss the emerging commercial landscape and define existing and new technologies.
References
-
- Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Annual report 2018. http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/NASDAQ_ISRG_20... (2019).
-
- Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program Collaborative. Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 214, 909–918.e1 (2012).
-
- National Bowel Cancer Audit. Annual report 2018. https://www.nboca.org.uk/content/uploads/2018/12/NBOCA-annual-report2018... (2018).
-
- Acuna, S. A. et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer: a noninferiority meta-analysis of quality of surgical resection outcomes. Ann. Surg. 269, 849–855 (2019). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
