Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 25:11:567.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00567. eCollection 2020.

Metacognition and Intersubjectivity: Reconsidering Their Relationship Following Advances From the Study of Persons With Psychosis

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon  1 , Andrew Gumley  2 , Hamish McLeod  2 , Paul H Lysaker  3   4
Affiliations

Metacognition and Intersubjectivity: Reconsidering Their Relationship Following Advances From the Study of Persons With Psychosis

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

As research on metacognition has progressed a significant array of definitions, methodologies and therapeutic applications have emerged. Some of this work has primarily framed metacognition as an activity carried out by one person in order to know, monitor, and adjust their beliefs, memories, and behaviors. Accordingly, problems with metacognition have often been characterized as issues related to cognition. This, however, risks neglecting how metacognition is also a fundamentally intersubjective act, one in which human beings know and reflect upon themselves and others primarily with and through connections with other people. In this paper, we review research on metacognition in schizophrenia using the integrative model of metacognition and a research paradigm in which metacognition is assessed within personal narratives. Stimulated by this work, we discuss how disturbances in intersubjective experience and metacognitive capacity mutually influence one another, with disruptions in metacognition perhaps more deeply understood as disruptions in relatedness with others. We then discuss how metacognition and intersubjectivity each affect mental health. We finally focus on the implications of this for treatments that target metacognition as well as future directions for research.

Keywords: intersubjectivity; metacognition; psychopathology; psychosis; psychotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnon-Ribenfeld N., Hasson-Ohayon I., Lavidor M., Atzil-Slonim D., Lysaker P. H. (2017). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the association between metacognitive abilities, symptoms and functioning among people with schizophrenia. Eur. Psychiatry 46 33–41. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.08.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Austin S. F., Lysaker P. H., Jansen J. E., Trauelsen A. M., Lyse Nielsen H. G., Buch Pedersen M., et al. (2019). Metacognitive capacity and negative symptoms in First Episode Psychosis: evidence of a prospective relationship over a three year follow-up. J. Exp. Psychopathol. 10:204380871882157 10.1177/2043808718821572 - DOI
    1. Aydin O., Balikci K., Tas C., Aydin P. U., Danaci A. E., Brüne M., et al. (2016). The developmental origins of metacognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 245 15–21. 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassman R. (2000). Agents, not objects: our fights to be. J. Clin. Psychol. 56 1395–1411. 10.1002/1097-4679(200011)56:11<1395::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beebe B., Knoblauch S., Rustin J., Sorter D. (2005). Forms of intersubjectivity in interpersonal/relational perspective. Int. J. Psychoanal. 90 347–361.