Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 31:72:265-278.
doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0112. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Preliminary Validation of Mirrored Scales for Monitoring Professional Soccer Training Sessions

Affiliations

Preliminary Validation of Mirrored Scales for Monitoring Professional Soccer Training Sessions

Rodrigo F Morandi et al. J Hum Kinet. .

Abstract

We aimed to create a single subjective method to assess both internal training loads and subsequent fatigue. This new training-fatigue (dose-response) scale (TFS) was composed of two similar scales with the same properties, metrics and construction criteria. These two scales were designed to rate the perceived exertion (RPETFS) and perceived fatigue (RPFTFS) in professional soccer players. Twenty-two athletes participated to establish reliability, and 15 participated to establish validity. For reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used. For criterion validity, the Spearman's correlation coefficient and linear regression analyses were applied. Associations between RPETFS and RPFTFS were verified by a chi square test, and a further factorial exploratory analysis was conducted. RPETFS and RPFTFS were found to be reliable (ICC 0.74 and 0.77, SEM 0.30 and 0.30, respectively) and valid. RPETFS was best explained by the internal load of the Banister training impulse (p < 0.001), while RPFTFS was best explained by the internal load of the Stagno training impulse (p < 0.001). An association was found between the scales (RPETFS and RPFTFS) in which training duration had a more substantial impact on these subjective perceptions than did training intensity (p < 0.01). RPETFS and RPFTFS scales are reliable and valid for monitoring training sessions in Brazilian professional soccer players. The simultaneous oscillations of the RPETFS and RPFTFS scores can be used by staff members to better plan weekly training programs based on dose-response ratings. Finally, training duration must be carefully controlled because it has a greater impact than intensity on subjective perceptions.

Keywords: ordinal subjective scales; rating of perceived exertion; recovery; soccer; training impulse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Training-fatigue scale composed of the RPETFS (left) and the RPFTFS (right) scales.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multiple stepwise linear regression between RPETFS and TRIMPB (first) and between RPFTFS and TRIMPMOD (second).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Simple linear regression between TRIMPB and sRPETFS (first) and between TRIMPMOD and RPFTFS (second).

References

    1. Antonacci L, Mortimer LF, Rodrigues VM, Coelho DB, Soares DD, Silami-Garcia E. Competition, estimated, and test maximum heart rate. J Sport Med Phys Fit. 2007;47:418–421. - PubMed
    1. Bangsbo J. The physiology of soccer--with special reference to intense intermittent exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1994;619:1–155. - PubMed
    1. Banister E. D. MacDougall J., A. Wenger H. J. Green H. Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books; 1991. Modeling elite athletic performance; pp. 403–425. &.
    1. Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998.
    1. Borresen J, Lambert MI. The quantification of training load, the training response and the effect on performance. Sports Med. 2009;39:779–795. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources