Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;65(4):477-486.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01359-6. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

"I wasn't ready": abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Affiliations

"I wasn't ready": abortion decision-making pathways in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Ramatou Ouedraogo et al. Int J Public Health. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objectives: This study explores abortion decision-making trajectories in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, examining the spaces for decision making that young people manage to create for themselves within restrictive policy, gender norms and other constraints.

Methods: The study presents data collected from observations in three referral health facilities in Ouagadougou and interviews (with 31 young women (aged 17-25) who had sought abortions and five men (aged 20-25) whose partners had done so). Using inductive content analysis, we capture the different streams, actors and rationales in the decision-making process, as well as the pattern of negotiation.

Results: Abortion decision-making trajectories are complex and affected by a range of factors including fertility desires, relationship stability and financial stability. The process can include intense periods of negotiation between intimate partners when their rationales are discordant. Constraints on women's decision making include restrictive policy environment, coercion from partners (threats, emotional blackmail and even physical force) and pressure from people in and out of their social network.

Conclusions: In a context where legal abortion is highly restricted and women's decision-making power is constrained, the abortion decision making appears as collective, operates in an uncertain time frame, an unofficial social environment and has an unpredictable collaborative mechanism.

Keywords: Abortion; Burkina Faso; Decision making; Ethnography; West Africa; Young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coding tree of the decision-making process Burkina Faso, 2011–2014
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of a decision-making process, Paula, 23 year old, Burkina Faso, 2011–2014

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amnesty International (2009) Giving life, risking death. Maternal mortality in Burkina Faso. Amnesty International Secretariat, London. https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/44000/afr600012009en.pdf
    1. Attané A. Cérémonies de naissance et conception de la personne au Burkina-Faso. L’Autre. 2007;8(3):21–35. doi: 10.3917/lautr.024.0021. - DOI
    1. Badini A (1978) La représentation de la vie et de la mort chez les mosé traditionnels de la Haute-Volta. Dissertation, Université de Lille III
    1. Bankole A, Singh S, Haas T. Reasons why women have induced abortions: evidence from 27 countries. Int Family Plan Perspect. 1998;24(3):117–128. doi: 10.2307/3038208. - DOI
    1. Bankole A, Hussain R, Sedgh G, Rossier C, Kaboré I, Guiella G (2013) Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Burkina Faso: causes and consequences. Guttmacher Institute, New York. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/unintended-pre...