Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 May;22(5):814-825.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13852. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Effect of dietary salt restriction on central blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intervention studies

Lanfranco D'Elia  1 , Ersilia La Fata  2 , Alfonso Giaquinto  1 , Pasquale Strazzullo  1 , Ferruccio Galletti  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of dietary salt restriction on central blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intervention studies

Lanfranco D'Elia et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2020 May.

Abstract

Central blood pressure (cBP) is highly associated with cardiovascular risk. Although reduction of salt intake leads to lower peripheral blood pressure (BP), the studies on cBP provided inconsistent results. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the available intervention trials of salt reduction on cBP values to reach definitive conclusions. A systematic search of the online databases available (up to December 2018) was conducted including the intervention trials that reported non-invasively assessed cBP changes after two different salt intake regimens. For each study, the mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a random-effect model. Sensitivity, heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed. Fourteen studies met the pre-defined inclusion criteria and provided 17 cohorts with 457 participants with 1-13 weeks of intervention time. In the pooled analysis, salt restriction was associated with a significant reduction in augmentation index (9.3%) as well as central systolic BP and central pulse pressure. There was a significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 70%), but no evidence of publication bias. Peripheral BP changes seemed to partially interfere on the relationship between salt restriction and cBP. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that dietary salt restriction reduces cBP. This effect seems to be, at least in part, independent of the changes in peripheral BP.

Keywords: augmentation index; central blood pressure; meta-analysis; pulse wave analysis; salt; sodium intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LD was a technical advisor to the World Health Organization and is a member of the scientific committee of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition. PS is an unpaid member of WASH, scientific coordinator of the Interdisciplinary Working Group for Reduction of Salt Intake in Italy (GIRCSI), and member of the committee for the preparation of the Italian Nutritional Guidelines. The remaining authors do not disclose any conflict of interest.

Part of the preliminary study data was previously presented at the British and Irish Hypertension Society 2019 Meeting.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Stepwise procedure for selection of the studies. Flowchart indicating the results of the systematic review with inclusions and exclusions
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A, Effect of lower sodium intake on augmentation index (AIx). Forest plot of the effect of lower dietary sodium intake on AIx in 17 population cohorts from 14 published studies. B, Effect of lower sodium intake on central systolic blood pressure (cSBP). Forest plot of the effect of lower dietary salt intake on cSBP in eight population cohorts from six published studies. C, Effect of lower sodium intake on central pulse pressure (cPP). Forest plot of the effect of lower dietary sodium intake on cPP in seven population cohorts from five published studies. Results are expressed as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Squares indicate study‐specific relative risk estimates (size of the square reflects the study‐specific statistical weight); horizontal lines indicate 95% CI; and diamond indicates the overall relative risk with its 95% CI. fHP, formerly healthy pregnant women; fPE, formerly pre‐eclamptic women; SS, salt‐sensitive participants; SR, salt‐resistant participants; YG, young participants; MA, middle‐aged participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Roman MJ, Okin PM, Kizer JR, Lee ET, Howard BV, Devereux RB. Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the strong heart study. J Hypertens. 2010;28:384‐388. - PubMed
    1. Jankowski P, Kawecka‐Jaszcz K, Czarnecka D, et al. Ascending aortic, but not brachial blood pressure‐derived indices are related to coronary atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176:151‐155. - PubMed
    1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, O'Rourke MF, Safar ME, Baou K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all‐cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(15):1865‐1871. - PubMed
    1. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kizer JR, et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the strong heart study. Hypertension. 2007;50:197‐203. - PubMed
    1. Safar ME, Blacher J, Pannier B, et al. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end‐stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;39:735‐738. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances