Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 26:11:563.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00563. eCollection 2020.

Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder

Affiliations

Dissociating Profiles of Social Cognitive Disturbances Between Mixed Personality and Anxiety Disorder

Kristína Czekóová et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: An emerging body of research has begun to elucidate disturbances to social cognition in specific personality disorders (PDs). No research has been conducted on patients with Mixed Personality Disorder (MPD), however, who meet multiple diagnostic criteria. Further, very few studies have compared social cognition between patients with PD and those presenting with symptomatic diagnoses that co-occur with personality pathologies, such as anxiety disorder (AD). The aim of this study was to provide a detailed characterization of deficits to various aspects of social cognition in MPD and dissociate impairments specific to MPD from those exhibited by patients with AD who differ in the severity of personality pathology.

Method: Building on our previous research, we administered a large battery of self-report and performance-based measures of social cognition to age-, sex- and education-matched groups of patients with MPD or AD, and healthy control participants (HCs; n = 29, 23, and 54, respectively). This permitted a detailed profiling of these clinical groups according to impairments in emotion recognition and regulation, imitative control, low-level visual perspective taking, and empathic awareness and expression.

Results: The MPD group demonstrated poorer emotion recognition for negative facial expressions relative to both HCs and AD. Compared with HCs, both clinical groups also performed significantly worse in visual perspective taking and interference resolution, and reported higher personal distress when empathizing and more state-oriented emotion regulation.

Conclusion: We interpret our results to reflect dysfunctional cognitive control that is common to patients with both MPD and AD. Given the patterns of affective dispositions that characterize these two diagnostic groups, we suggest that prolonged negative affectivity is associated with inflexible styles of emotion regulation and attribution. This might potentiate the interpersonal dysfunction exhibited in MPD, particularly in negatively valenced and challenging social situations.

Keywords: Social cognition; anxiety; emotion recognition; emotion regulation; empathy; imitative control; personality disorder; visual perspective taking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Comparisons of Socio-cognitive Aspects among Patient Groups and Healthy Controls. For comparisons with other studies, plots present means and standard errors for the MPD (red), AD (blue) and HC groups (green). ∗∗p < 0.01, p < 0.05.

References

    1. Aldao A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: capturing context. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8 155–172. 10.1177/1745691612459518 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baskin-Sommers A., Krusemark E., Ronningstam E. (2014). Empathy in narcissistic personality disorder: from clinical and empirical perspectives. Personal. Disord. 5 323–333. 10.1037/per0000061 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beeney J. E., Hallquist M. N., Ellison W. D., Levy K. N. (2016). Self-other disturbance in borderline personality disorder: neural, self-report and performance-based evidence. Personal. Disord. 7 28–39. 10.1002/cncr.27633 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Methodol. 57 289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x - DOI
    1. Berenson K. R., Dochat C., Martin C. G., Yang X., Rafaeli E., Downey G. (2018). Identification of mental states and interpersonal functioning in borderline personality disorder. Personal. Disord. 9 172–181. 10.1037/per0000228 - DOI - PMC - PubMed