Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Mar 25:11:564.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00564. eCollection 2020.

Multidimensional Approach to Frailty

Affiliations
Review

Multidimensional Approach to Frailty

Marta Wleklik et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The concept of frailty syndrome (FS) was first described in the scientific literature three decades ago. For a very long time, we understood it as a geriatric problem, recently becoming one of the dominant concepts in cardiology. It identifies symptoms of FS in one in 10 elderly people. It is estimated that in Europe, 17% of elderly people have FS. The changes in FS resemble and often overlap with changes associated with the physiological aging process of the body. Although there are numerous scientific reports confirming that FS is age correlated, it is not an unavoidable part of the aging process and does not apply only to the elderly. FS is a reversible clinical condition. To maximize benefits of frailty-reversing activities for patient with frailty, identification of its determinants appears to be fundamental. Many of the determinants of the FS have already been known: reduction in physical activity, malnutrition, sarcopenia, polypharmacy, depressive symptom, cognitive disorders, and lack of social support. This review shows that insight into FS determinants is the starting point for building both the comprehensive definition of FS and the adoption of the assessment method of FS, and then successful clinical management.

Keywords: cardiology; determinants; disability; elderly; frailty syndrome; multi-morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Determinants of FS.

References

    1. Afilalo J. (2011). Frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease: why, when, and how to measure. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 5 467–472. 10.1007/s12170-011-0186-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J. (2016). Conceptual models of frailty: the sarcopenia phenotype. Can. J. Cardiol. 32 1051–1055. 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.05.017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J., Alexander K. P., Mack M. J., Maurer M. S., Green P., Allen L. A., et al. (2014). Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63 747–762. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.070 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J., Eisenberg M. J., Morin J.-F., Bergman H., Monette J., Noiseux N., et al. (2010). Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56 1668–1676. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afilalo J., Mottillo S., Eisenberg M. J., Alexander K. P., Noiseux N., Perrault L. P., et al. (2012). Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 5 222–228. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963157 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources