Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Feb;60(1):249-258.
doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02244-x. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

Distinct genetic subtypes of adiposity and glycemic changes in response to weight-loss diet intervention: the POUNDS Lost trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Distinct genetic subtypes of adiposity and glycemic changes in response to weight-loss diet intervention: the POUNDS Lost trial

Yuhang Chen et al. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Obesity is a heterogeneous condition and distinct adiposity subtypes may differentially affect type 2 diabetes risk. We assessed relations between genetically determined subtypes of adiposity and changes in glycemic traits in a dietary intervention trial.

Methods: The four genetic subtypes of adiposity including waist-hip ratio-increase only (WHRonly+), body mass index-increase only (BMIonly+), WHR-increase and BMI-increase (BMI+WHR+), and WHR-decrease and BMI-increase (BMI+WHR-) were assessed by polygenetic scores (PGSs), calculated based on 159 single nucleotide polymorphisms related to BMI and/or WHR. We examined the associations between the four PGSs and changes in fasting glucose, insulin, β-cell function (HOMA-B) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in 692 overweight participants (84% white Americans) who were randomly assigned to one of four weight-loss diets in a 2-year intervention trial.

Results: Higher BMI+WHR-PGS was associated with a greater decrease in 2-year changes in waist circumference in white participants (P = 0.002). We also found significant interactions between WHRonly+PGS and dietary protein in 2-year changes in fasting glucose and HOMA-B (P = 0.0007 and < 0.0001, respectively). When consuming an average-protein diet, participants with higher WHRonly+PGS showed less increased fasting glucose (β = - 0.46, P = 0.006) and less reduction in HOMA-B (β = 0.02, P = 0.005) compared with lower WHRonly+PGS. Conversely, eating high-protein diet was associated with less decreased HOMA-B among individuals with lower than higher WHRonly+PGS (β = - 0.02, P = 0.006).

Conclusions: Distinct genetically determined adiposity subtypes may differentially modify the effects of weight-loss diets on improving glucose metabolism in white Americans. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00072995.

Keywords: Adiposity subtypes; Body mass index; Gene–diet interaction; Glycemic traits; Polygenetic score; Waist–hip ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effects of the WHRonly+ PGS and weight-loss diets on changes in fasting glucose and HOMA-B during the 2-year intervention in white participants. Values were means±SEs, adjusted for age, sex, baseline BMI, weight loss at 2 years, and baseline values of the respective outcomes in the general linear models. HOMA-B were log-transformed before analysis. High-Pro, high protein; Avg-Pro, average protein; HOMA-B, homeostasis model assessment of β cell function; T, tertile. Panel a: changes in glucose; panel b: changes in HOMA-B.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
WHRonly+ PGS with 2-year trajectory of changes in fasting glucose and HOMA-B in response to weight-loss diet in white participants. Values were means±SEs after adjustment for age, sex, baseline BMI, weight change, and baseline values for respective phenotypes. P values were tested for the interaction between PGS and intervention time. HOMA-B was log-transformed before analysis. HOMA-B, homeostasis model assessment of β cell function; T, tertile. Panel a: changes in glucose in high protein group; panel b: changes in glucose in average protein group; panel c: changes in HOMA-B in high protein group; panel d: changes in HOMA-B in average protein group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kopelman PG (2000) Obesity as a medical problem. Nature 404:635–643. 10.1038/35007508 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, et al. (2003) Prevalence of Obesity, Diabetes, and Obesity-Related Health Risk Factors, 2001. JAMA 289(1):76–79. 10.1001/jama.289.1.76 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang T, Zhang R, Ma X, Wang S, He Z, Huang Y, et al. (2018) Causal Association of Overall Obesity and Abdominal Obesity with Type 2 Diabetes: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis. Obesity 26(5):934–942. 10.1002/oby.22167 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, Smith SR, Ryan DH (2009) Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 360(9):859–873. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Knowler William C., Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346(6):393–403. 10.1056/NEJMoa012512 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data